Boy, do I hope you are right. I still can't get past the reference the GJ made to the Ramsey's assisting someone who they knew had committed "first degree murder". I can't make a connection between that verbiage and Burke's guilt, since he was too young to be charged with a crime of any sort. IMO, I have to think an adult was the perpetrator.
The only perp I would think of would be John Andrew. That the GJ is referring to besides Burke.
He was in Boulder on Christmas Day and supposedly showed back up at the airport the day after when all this happened. However, I never really thought it was him is because he proved he was with his family on Christmas night.
ON THE OTHER HAND--- If someone can't prove beyond a doubt where they were the night of a killing, then look closer at the person.
The GJ comments need to be taken with a grain of salt. They were dealing with a DA who was not going to prosecute. They needed to make it sound as bad as possible. The person the Ramsey's "helped" could have easily been Burke. The reason I say Burke is because of 3 different things.
1. The flashlight, which should have had numerous fingerprints on it, was wiped clean. Now how did that happen?
2. Burke's medical records have been sealed. I am not sure if his current adult records remain sealed but his med records from Boulder were definitely sealed. Now what could be in a child's medical history at age 1-9 that would necessitate sealing and privacy? All that kids go thru is shots, vaccinations, colds, flu, etc. Why would you seal THAT?
However, if Burke had a rage condition or sexual devianciancy that PR sought treatment for---that would be part of his medical history.
Suppose the cops got access to everyone's medical history. They certainly had JBs. And they see that Burke has been to a psychologist regularly for some condition which could cause him to get enraged and basically just attack. Especially JB. Even if Burke were innocent of hurting JB that night, the med records would send the police to him quickly as the one.
I am surprised no one else thinks a sealed med record of a small boy is strange.
3. The ransom note not having fingerprints is a huge red flag. And points to an inside job. If PR wrote the ransom note she was wearing gloves. If an intruder wrote the note, he wore gloves. But if PR was innocent of the crime or of covering up, she would have come downstairs as usual, not wearing gloves, and picked up the note, since it was "on the stairs".
Right? Maybe John didn't touch it, but she surely did. How come no fingerprints?????
yes, it was an inside job. Even John Ramsey told LA it was an inside job. Now my gosh why would he say that? Or did he not mean to?