EnvoyDriver61
Howdy Y'all
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 95
By my understanding of controlling, NC acted in that manner toward BC because she knew that spending was a means to really upset him.
Was she a controlling individual? No, I'd say not in the general sense of the term. As for BC, I don't know whether he would be considered controlling in the general sense of the term or if his high sense of self-worth and superiority to others made him just assume that whatever plan of action he deemed for a situation was just "better" than the average person.
Yes, we'd call that controlling; but, in his mind, no one measured up to him in any shape or form, so his decisions and actions on just about ANY matter, no matter whom it involved, was just superior be the mere fact HE thought of it.
Was she a controlling individual? No, I'd say not in the general sense of the term. As for BC, I don't know whether he would be considered controlling in the general sense of the term or if his high sense of self-worth and superiority to others made him just assume that whatever plan of action he deemed for a situation was just "better" than the average person.
Yes, we'd call that controlling; but, in his mind, no one measured up to him in any shape or form, so his decisions and actions on just about ANY matter, no matter whom it involved, was just superior be the mere fact HE thought of it.