stmarysmead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,302
- Reaction score
- 16,923
I just think if they had the evidence that pointed to Terri as the culprit she would have been arrested and charged by now. Nobody can be prosecuted on beliefs and opinions only. They took it to a grand jury, and nothing happened. Nobody saw her leave the school with Kyron, nobody saw him in the truck with her that day.
As for the MFH, I think it's the LS's word against hers and it can't be proven, so they won't be able to charge her without proof. People lie all the time. He lied for whatever reason, and LE looked like fools for trying to set her up.
I don't think she is guilty of anything related to Kyron. If she had been abusing him, he would have told his dad. And I see no evidence that she hated Kyron, other than the mom's statement. If you knew your child's step-parent hated your child, would you sit back and not do or say anything?
I still believe some predator snatched this child because the school was so crowded and no one was paying any attention. I will continue to believe that until LE releases the evidence to prove I'm wrong. It won't bother me one bit to admit that, as I've been wrong before. I just prefer to sit on the fence for now.
"I just think if they had the evidence that pointed to Terri as the culprit she would have been arrested and charged by now. Nobody can be prosecuted on beliefs and opinions only. They took it to a grand jury, and nothing happened. Nobody saw her leave the school with Kyron, nobody saw him in the truck with her that day."
I understand what you are saying. But...
If nothing exists, no evidence at all..if Terri is innocent and the "case" against her consists of only "beliefs and opinions"....why would she not fight for her child?
There are many things one might do...out of unfounded nervousness, when you KNOW you are innocent...give up a home, a job...but YOUR CHILD?
There are many things, a good lawyer could convince one to do..but THAT? Just to be extra careful...when there is ZIP? Nothing? Nada?
Under the conditions you describe, she has nothing to fear. This case is very public, would the police manufacture evidence at this point? Innocent people have been charged with murder...but there has to be something. Your opinion that there is NOTHING...no one saw anything...they have zip...makes it absolutely incomprehensible that Terri is not fighting for Baby K.
Furthermore, if there are no hateful emails, why doesn't Terri or her lawyer, demand Desiree stop making such statements? Call her bluff. If there is NOTHING...WOW...wouldn't that shut up Desiree in a hurry to be publicly proven a liar.
But no.
This woman...so sinned against...but not sinning...allows these types of statements..as do her lawyers. And they allow her Baby..at such a young and formidable age...to be absent from her so long...that the child probably barely remembers her.
For WHAT? For fear of nothingness? For fear of being suddenly framed when this case is already so public? Why does she fear the psych exam? Why has she not challenged one of Desiree statements.
Oh.
Because her lawyer says so. She has let her lawyers separate her THIS LONG from her child...when, as you believe, there is not one whit of evidence against her. She lives imprisoned practically with her aging parents...but it's just to be cautious.
That is quite a sacrifice. It's like having a heart transplant just in case the doctor is wrong and the pain is not indigestion.