KeyboardCat
Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 7
Well, the order said they had probable cause, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
With probable cause, authorities can obtain search warrants and the like to further investigate. If they feel their case isn't strong enough to go to trial, of course they wouldn't arrest her, since after an arrest they have a limited time frame in which they have to formally charge her. Bringing charges against her without the investigation complete, or without being as solid as they feel they may need, would be foolish.
And besides that, the term "probable cause" in the restraining order is used by Kaine Horman from what I can see. It may be simply his interpretation of what was said/presented to him when police informed him of a murder for hire against him. The police may not have used that term.
But even if that term was used by police, it doesn't mean they want to arrest and charge her just yet.
With probable cause, authorities can obtain search warrants and the like to further investigate. If they feel their case isn't strong enough to go to trial, of course they wouldn't arrest her, since after an arrest they have a limited time frame in which they have to formally charge her. Bringing charges against her without the investigation complete, or without being as solid as they feel they may need, would be foolish.
And besides that, the term "probable cause" in the restraining order is used by Kaine Horman from what I can see. It may be simply his interpretation of what was said/presented to him when police informed him of a murder for hire against him. The police may not have used that term.
But even if that term was used by police, it doesn't mean they want to arrest and charge her just yet.