Pink Panther
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 10,700
- Reaction score
- 173
She may eventually get hurt, when she trips over her nose.
It's dragging on the ground, even now!
Lol!
I hope so.
MOO
She may eventually get hurt, when she trips over her nose.
It's dragging on the ground, even now!
She may eventually get hurt, when she trips over her nose.
It's dragging on the ground, even now!
Given the kind of antics we have been privy to from Cindy Anthony, I just can not imagine her having any kind of role, except to reiterate the point that she has lied, tampered with evidence, lied, showed blatant disregard for the law, the court, and officers of the court, committed perjury, did I mention lied, time and time again. i can only hope that the statements she has given this week will lay the ground work for the trial and come back to finally bite her in the but, or finally give them a reason to arrest her. Casey lived her version of " Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves" right under their roof, practically with their blessing The only real outcome might be that Casey has never really had any kind of moral compass, and is who she is because of Cindyand a jury just might consider LWOP in the end. Isn't it ironic.
There is always the possibility that Cindy will have a serious "Come to Jesus" event in her life, but I fear I will be Pope, hell will freeze over and we will have world peace before then. Surely MOO
Not sure if this is the right thread for this question, but it does pertain to Cindy:
Does anyone know if the prosecution can admit videos of Cindy's personal appearances on LKL, news programs, etc.?
CA's role, despite what she thinks, will be to ensure that her daughter will remain in jail for the rest of her life. KC and Caylee's demise would have appeared and disappeared in the media (just as countless other murders do) if she (CA) had kept her mouth shut. Instead, the public is watching and the facts are now of interest and as a result, I think her role in proving her daughter GUILTY will be very significant.
MOO
I'm guessing NO! Lying is not a crime in her book, so, unless it was under oath.....(thereby noticed that it would be considered perjury, thus unlawful) I doubt anything she's said (which she hadn't sworn to beforehand, ie LKL etc.) would be considered as evidence.
See, if she has conflicting testimony that are both under oath, that is one thing, it's another if she told one story under oath, and a completely different one while chatting about.
Actually, yes they can. Regardless if the interviews she gave weren't under oath. If Cindy gets on the stand and lies or gives conflicting accounts, anything and everything can be used to impeach her credibility. Quite frankly all they really need is her testimony at the Morgan Depos. Cindy's goose is cooked. She's backed herself into a corner. Any thought of being able to give testimony to get her daughter off is completely gone. A few of Scott P interviews were played in court as well.
Actually, yes they can. Regardless if the interviews she gave weren't under oath. If Cindy gets on the stand and lies or gives conflicting accounts, anything and everything can be used to impeach her credibility. Quite frankly all they really need is her testimony at the Morgan Depos. Cindy's goose is cooked. She's backed herself into a corner. Any thought of being able to give testimony to get her daughter off is completely gone. A few of Scott P interviews were played in court as well.
That will never be allowed IMO.For the next event, will CA insist that she be allowed to join GA in his deposition so she can hold his hand?
For all the world to see.....which is ironic since I believe her entire reason for lying was to preserve the image of herself as a good mom.
For the next event, will CA insist that she be allowed to join GA in his deposition so she can hold his hand?
That will never be allowed IMO.
Oh yeah....skeery face and all.I know but can't ya just see it now? LOL