BigFatMommyDog
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,932
- Reaction score
- -25
Is this really KC?
debunked long long long ago
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this really KC?
*wiping my eyes* Ok. ehem, being serious here. So is the DT going to try and say that GA looked this guy up in some public directory? That it was the wrong number but GA thought it was the right number to get a hold of Thompson? Goodness, do I even make sense anymore? :crazy:
So all they have to do is call him to the stand and verify that the number GA called is NOT and was NEVER his number. Done deal. Next....
so how can I watch Rhornsby live at 5:30 from my PC?
About time someone brings some sense to the madness, Rhornsby even though I disagree with you at times. Can you let the State know too please and Lipman!
Call the number, Mark!! See who answers and when it is George's old work colleague, release a new statement.
But think about this...as NG said last night....GA and CA got out of the car one afternoon and one of those "protesters" spit on GA. So....what would you do? I know what I would have done. And it just might have involved a baseball bat.
Everyone knows, also can someone give me readers digest of how AZ debunked this? (Preferably AZLawyer). So I get it right.
Just to make sure in case any of the "guests" on this thread are those people we're talking to:
There was no misdialing. George really dialed the number that shows up on his cell records, but the number IMO did not belong to Vasco T but to someone George needed to contact for his new job at Andrews International. That number erroneously shows up as belonging to Vasco T in a couple of public records databases. Vasco T's real number is very close to that number.
Everyone knows, also can someone give me readers digest of how AZ debunked this? (Preferably AZLawyer). So I get it right.
They didn't get Vasco T's records IMO. They are looking at George's records. The number for not-Vasco (see my posts above) is 407-4*5-3082. The first contact was George calling this number on July 9, 2008 when he had to drive down to (IIRC) Celebration, FL for his brand-new job. Then George texted the number July 14 at 10:22 am, when IIRC he was supposed to be travelling again to Celebration and gave his employer some story about a traffic problem and instead stayed in Orlando--IMO to try to figure out WTF Casey was doing. George received a short (12-character) response text from this number at 1:32 pm, and responded again by text at 2:49 pm. The number then called George July 19 at 11:08 am--probably George's work trying to figure out when and if he would be returning to his job--and texted him on July 24 at 5:32 pm.
I'm still laughing that this guy's name is really Vasco Dagama Thompson! ONly in Florida do you find a criminal with a Portuguese explorer's name..............Vasco Da Gama!!!!! ay yi yi!!!
There is a 97.4% chance I will refer to a colleague in AZ who has debunked this witness years ago when I go on at 530 on your favorite local news station
I think that woman has been removed from the defense witness list. There was a video news report after that witness was called for jury selection in Pinellas County, and at that time she said something about no longer on the defense witness list. But I do think the defense will be showing video of George's outbursts of temper at the protestors and will have witnesses take the stand and testify to his temper.
I'm still on page 2 of this thread, but as soon as I read the post on the first page that gave the number as 407-4*5-3082, I did Google searches for:I just found some old emails I was exchanging with another WS'er on this subject. Apparently I determined that Vasco T's true number was 407-2*6-3082 instead of 407-4*5-3082. (Yes, the stars stand for the same # lol.) But at some point his number got recorded in a public records database incorrectly and got mixed up with the other number.