That would be an amazing connection, I wonder if the defense is aware of that?
Using past indicators, let's ponder that for a moment... Um, no!
That would be an amazing connection, I wonder if the defense is aware of that?
According to a TH on Dr Drew, HHJP prosecuted VT during his time as a prosecutor. Looking for confirmation elsewhere...
http://fl.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19930521_0045878.FL.htm/qx
This is the appeal, and I don't see JP's name, but only looked at the first page. Haven't found the original case yet.
Good morning everyone....new member and lost.
Can anyone tell me if there is a daily thread open for discussion during the trial
Tried hard to find one but no luck.
Thank you very much
I just saw a printed quote on screen on The Nancy Grace Entertainment Show from VT's new attorney - something about his previous public defender not being very good or something. Didn't pay close enough attention, and cannot go back on my DVR as I had changed the channel.
New attorney's name? MATT MORGAN. Any relation to John?
ETA: Just checked out the Morgan & Morgan website. Matt Morgan is definately listed. That didn't take long at all - just as many here predicted yesterday.
I hope they stick it to the defense for not doing their due diligence on the phone records, or perhaps doing so, but ignoring the info for their own purposes.
This is somewhat contrary to the theory outlined in this thread. We were supposed to think that VT never really had the number that George called. That it was strictly a public record database error that caused the problem. But now it looks like that database may not have been in error after all.
This is somewhat contrary to the theory outlined in this thread. We were supposed to think that VT never really had the number that George called. That it was strictly a public record database error that caused the problem. But now it looks like that database may not have been in error after all.