It's very convenient that everything she needed to know was in the first sentence.
It was all lies anyway. She said she only ever read the first couple of lines, until the "we have your daughter" part. Okay, but then she is on the phone with 911 and knows that the note is signed by SBTC. Then during her police interview 3 months later she says she is standing at the front door wondering if she should have heeded the warnings in the note about calling the police. But she is still claiming not to have read the note. She is never cross examined or pressured on any of these inconsistencies. Makes you want to pull your hair out.