I had never heard of Calpol but read that it's a children's pain reliever available in the UK among other countries (not U.S.). I don't know whether or not is has a specific sedating effect, but many children's pain relievers can cause sleepiness. As an adult who occasionally takes Benedryl for my seasonal allergies, I know from personal experience that this OTC med causes drowsiness. When I take one 25mg. tablet, I usually can't keep my BetteDavisEyes open and amfftobed:
IIRC, Madeleine's mother is/was a physician, so she likely had access to prescription versions of children's pain relievers and/or cold/allergy medications. It might not have been necessary to give the child/children a sedative because a megadose of pain reliever and/or cold/allergy medicine could have been fatal. :moo:
Brief statement from go in files
It would surprise me if they released all of their medical records. THe strain of having 3 children under the age of 5 and holding a full time GP position.
PHYSICAL / APARTMENT / ENTRY
1. All five markers in a sample found under the tiles, behind the sofa (exactly where Eddie, the EVRD [Cadaver] dog and Keela, the CSI [Human Blood] dog, both indicated), are 100% compatible with Madeleine's DNA profile
misleading, they are also compatible with many people including her father and other people had bled in the flat
2. Fifteen of the markers, in a sample found under the luggage liner o
f the McCann's Scenic (hired 24 days later), are 100% compatible with Madeleine's DNA profile
highly misleading. the fifteen markers were found in a batch of 37 that came from three to five people. whilst fifteen of these markers are found in madeleines dna, it was impossible to say whether these fifteen markers came from one person, they could have come from up to five different people. and all of the fifteen markers are 100% compatible with kate and gerry mcca,, madeleines grandparents and other family members all of whom were seen using the car. basicly if any two parents use a car and leave behind their dna the markers found will be 100% compatible with all of their biological children even if those children never set foor in the car.
3. Shutters were not jemmied or forced, as claimed by the parents
the parents never claimed this. this comes from an interview with a relative and she said the windows had been jemmied (which just means forced) or something. she got this from a paniked very late night phonecall from a hysterical gerry mccann, but she never actually says he says this. its a fair assumption for her to have made if gerry was screaming hysterically about finding the window open and madeleine gone.
4. No signs of forced entry anywhere in the apartment
the window was found open, and it could be opened easily from outside, the patio doors were also unlocked. other flats in complex had been robbed with no sign of forced entry either.
5. No physical evidence of anyone having entered or left via the window, including:
no reason why window was no opened to either pass madeleine out of or as emergency escape route, there were two other entrances.
6. No Lichen disturbance
there was no lichen to distrub
7. No Fibres
pj did not do a proper forensic search of the flat until months later, and lots of people had been at the window. why would fibres be left anyone there was no broken glass.
8. No Finger prints of abductor
how do you know, as the abductor has not been identified so his prints not taken, the flat was used by lots of people.
9. No footprints on bed
why would someone stand on the bed it was not near the window
10. Only finger prints on the window are those of Kate
incorrect only identified finger prints were kates, there were also unidentified prints. the abductor could have worn gloves. plus this was a rental flat yet no one finds it suspicious that the only identified prints by the window were from the person who handled the area after madeleine disappeared, where were all the other prints? plus even the pj admitted they made mistakes with the fingerprinting and did not properly search the flat forensicly for months.[/QUOTE]
scotland yard are not fools, i really think if these blogs had real evidence scotland yard might also be aware of it. But scotland yard have stated officially now the mccanns and those known to madeleine are not suspects or people of interest.
mine in red
7. No Fibres
pj did not do a proper forensic search of the flat until months later, and lots of people had been at the window. why would fibres be left anyone there was no broken glass.
THere was 2 dogs one was a cavader dog. It alerted on madaline's cozy cat that had been washed, the stench of death stays even after washing. It also alerted a few more times in that department. the dog had been used in 200 cases and had never been wrong.
Same old BS from Scotland Yard.
Lets see them actually do something instead of running numerous reviews and accusing the Portugese of being inept.
They keep squealing to the media about their brain waves eg "We haven't found her body, so she might be alive!" but no one has been questioned, nowhere has been searched, the cell phone communications of that night remain unexamined.
Until someone does something tangible, it's just more spin.
I will readily admit that I know next to nothing about cadaver dogs and the smell of death, so my question is this: how long does that smell stick around for cadaver dogs? Because I have a LOT of vintage and antique stuff, including furniture. No way to tell if anyone died around any of it. We already know cadaver dogs are not an exact science, so I'm wondering if investigators take this into consideration.
Just FYI part of me wants to believe Madeleine is alive and will be found but another part feels as though she is dead. It's such a confusing case.
I have always thought, that the Dr's wanted to be with their friends, and couldn't get Maddie settled down to sleep, so they drugged her. I think it happens more than we could guess, I also think it is what happened to Baby Lisa Irwin.
Now how they got rid of her body and all that, I don't know.
I have always thought, that the Dr's wanted to be with their friends, and couldn't get Maddie settled down to sleep, so they drugged her. I think it happens more than we could guess, I also think it is what happened to Baby Lisa Irwin.
Now how they got rid of her body and all that, I don't know.
Yet there was no evidence of sedation, or drug toxicity, so that's just plucking an idea out of thin air. Plus there is no time for them to have hidden a body, and why would they fight to get the met to investigate the case if they were guilty why not leave it closed.