Yep. She want this done and over with."I don't understand" will be his appeal. Opper is great....she is doing all possible to avoid an appeal and trying to close this.
I think it is a bad situation if he does not go. He will say he did not "understand" the situation and we will be hearing about this non stop.Being that he is representing the plantive. I'm not sure how he can afford not to be present at the presentation of evidence into the record. If he does not show up he will be unable to object 6,000 times to whatever the prosecution says while there.
Maybe they can promise him a Happy Meal with a toy on the way back from the ride in the car. He would change his mind. He acts like a 3 year old.he probably will change his mind and go...they probably should have gone over all of this with him yesterday.
Yay! I missed this…did they say what kind of shoes? Were they GB Packer flip flops as he professed over and over about with the detective when he was apprehended?Woo-hoo, they got the shoes and hoodie.
Yay! I missed this…did they say what kind of shoes? We’re they GB Packer flip flops as he professed over and over about with the detective when he was apprehended?
And yet he is representing himself ?Maybe they can promise him a Happy Meal with a toy on the way back from the ride in the car. He would change his mind. He acts like a 3 year old.
Mr. Brooks is representing the defendant - himself. The DAs office counsel represents the plaintiff - the state.Being that he is representing the plantive. I'm not sure how he can afford not to be present at the presentation of evidence into the record. If he does not show up he will be unable to object 6,000 times to whatever the prosecution says while there.
yep been confirmed he is going..I think she was using reverse psychology on him and it worked.She wanted him there...one less thing to argue about.Watch, he will go to the garage to see the vehicle.
First he doesn't want to go because of relevancy despite the vehicle being evidence, then he wonders how it is being done without his consent despite being told it has already been ruled on and his objection noted for the record (like 10 times), then he is making words about shackles and shocks, then he tells the judge that she is violating his constitutional rights but in the end - he'll go.
His ego won't let him miss this opportunity.