A registered sex offender in Eau Claire has been missing since July.
Eau Claire sex offender’s whereabouts unknown, warrant issued for arrest
Eau Claire sex offender’s whereabouts unknown, warrant issued for arrest
The Sherrif now says that he has nothing to indicate that Jayme wasn't involved, yet on day one he tells the world that she is not a suspect. Seems to me this guy says what he fells like saying on any given day.
Jumping off your thoughts: he stated today on the DrydenWire interview that the phone was found inside the house, but not near to where the commotion was going down. We know from the panty thief that Jayme's room is off the deck with the sliding door somewhere. If Jayme woke up to hear gunshots, and maybe other things, perhaps she dashed into mom's room, mom is struggling with someone, and Jayme grab's mom's phone and dials 911? She may not even have seen what was going down - she may only have heard the shots, and some commotion - enough to know it wasn't good? She dials 911 and drops the phone to run to help mom? She might be heard in the commotion? I could see a terrified kid running to help a parent in distress, and totally dropping the phone - hoping that the 911 alone was enough to get help there fast. Maybe the phone battery had just enough life in it to get the dispatcher and died on it's own thus when dispatch called back, they were sent to voicemail? Interestingly, and I'd love to know - did it ring or just go directly to voicemail? If it went direct, its possible someone hit the decline call button (if that phone offered that option), or might suggest battery died.Do any of you have a good time line, regarding WHEN the first sheriff indicated they believed Jayme was home at the time of the murders based "on the 911 call and evidence at the scene"? JMO but I'm not sure he'd have had a chance to HEAR the 911 call ... which leads me to believe that the LOCATION of that phone which raises that significance.
Interesting, the sheriff says they called the school cop, woke him up, to ask if a child lived in that home. .. what a crazy lot of work those responding officers accomplished in a very short time. What, dear God, happened in that home between 12:30 and 1:30? May this new flurry of coverage yield the tip that brings Jayme home.
If she had a 19yr old boyfriend.. surely they know that by now, and know who he is?The oddly specific examples keep coming. First the half-eaten McDonald's cheeseburger comment, and now "they" were in the house probably for not more than "4 minutes". Not 5 minutes? Does "they" mean more than one person? And no comment on rumors of a 19 year old "boyfriend"? That is a comment in itself. This just gets weirder and weirder.
Looks like a wedge type object of some sort. First thing that came to mind is a nail pulled. But how that damage could be caused from that and the force behind it is beyond my thinking right nowIn viewing the chair photo on a hi-def computer monitor, it's clear that there is something wedged and protruding from the area of the split.
View attachment 154701 View attachment 154702
I also found it interesting that he didn't use the word "cleared" when discussing family. He said they had been interviewed and we're cooperating. But there are a lot of interesting "no comment"s.
Having difficulty viewing the sheriff's video - can someone give me a time stamp when he talks about four minutes? Thanks.
If the call went out at the beginning of the crime, then I imagine Jayme woke to hearing her father killed, ran to mom and sought protection - and I don't want to imagine how it unfolded there. He wouldn't comment on whether a sexual assault took place during the attack which was interesting when he implied today the perp was in an out within a few minutes. Doesn't seem like a sexual assault could have taken place in the time frame of 4 minutes - does it? So what might have made the mattress removed from the house significant?
Do any of you have a good time line, regarding WHEN the first sheriff indicated they believed Jayme was home at the time of the murders based "on the 911 call and evidence at the scene"? JMO but I'm not sure he'd have had a chance to HEAR the 911 call ... which leads me to believe that the LOCATION of that phone which raises that significance.
Interesting, the sheriff says they called the school cop, woke him up, to ask if a child lived in that home. .. what a crazy lot of work those responding officers accomplished in a very short time. What, dear God, happened in that home between 12:30 and 1:30? May this new flurry of coverage yield the tip that brings Jayme home.
He thinks the perp was in the house for only four minutes? Facinating. The neighbors account of gun shots now seems even more implausible. IMO
Edited spelling
bbmI realize the focus is now on the chair, but my mind keeps going back to former posts re: a younger Denise living in an apartment where a brutal killing took place. I have long considered that somehow she could be the focus rather than James. No idea why I thought this - just another idea that could be the reason for the invasion and killing.
Do any of you have a good time line, regarding WHEN the first sheriff indicated they believed Jayme was home at the time of the murders based "on the 911 call and evidence at the scene"? JMO but I'm not sure he'd have had a chance to HEAR the 911 call ... which leads me to believe that the LOCATION of that phone which raises that significance.
Interesting, the sheriff says they called the school cop, woke him up, to ask if a child lived in that home. .. what a crazy lot of work those responding officers accomplished in a very short time. What, dear God, happened in that home between 12:30 and 1:30? May this new flurry of coverage yield the tip that brings Jayme home.
He thinks the perp was in the house for only four minutes? Facinating. The neighbors account of gun shots now seems even more implausible. IMO
Edited spelling
That makes no sense. Four minutes to kill James, Denise amd grab Jayme. If so, Jayme is the target.
But maybe he meant the perp(s) were there for minutes, not four minutes.
Not necessarily. The shots could have still happened at 12:31, they left by 12:35. Could have taken Denise 15 minutes to drag her dying self to another room where her phone was. The noise on the phone could simply have been the dog freaking out in another room.
Not necessarily. The shots could have still happened at 12:31, they left by 12:35. Could have taken Denise 15 minutes to drag her dying self to another room where her phone was. The noise on the phone could simply have been the dog freaking out in another room.
With all due respect, a hi-def monitor does not improve a low res image. I wish it did, I could perhaps tell you a lot more if I could just zoom in clearly.In viewing the chair photo on a hi-def computer monitor, it's clear that there is something wedged and protruding from the area of the split.
View attachment 154701 View attachment 154702
The oddly specific examples keep coming. First the half-eaten McDonald's cheeseburger comment, and now "they" were in the house probably for not more than "4 minutes". Not 5 minutes? Does "they" mean more than one person? And no comment on rumors of a 19 year old "boyfriend"? That is a comment in itself. This just gets weirder and weirder.
From something with a sharp blade, which broke and left back a part of the blade??could the chair have been used in a attempt to shield oneself from a shot?
The oddly specific examples keep coming. First the half-eaten McDonald's cheeseburger comment, and now "they" were in the house probably for not more than "4 minutes". Not 5 minutes? Does "they" mean more than one person? And no comment on rumors of a 19 year old "boyfriend"? That is a comment in itself. This just gets weirder and weirder.