Exactly, luck of the draw. That is the first thing LE does these days, gather all the video, and hope that the perp is on there. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.The luck was that the car was caught on video.
Exactly, luck of the draw. That is the first thing LE does these days, gather all the video, and hope that the perp is on there. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.The luck was that the car was caught on video.
The neighbors would have heard more than two shots then right?
Exactly, luck of the draw. That is the first thing LE does these days, gather all the video, and hope that the perp is on there. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
I think so.The neighbors reported two shots roughly 30 minutes prior to the 911 call. Isn't that one of the clear facts of Jayme's disappearance?
I think they would be able to determine that quite quickly. Every device has a unique IP address, sites like facebook could easily provide data that would show from what IP addresses her account had been accessed. If there are regular occurrences of different IPs then it is safe to say she was using a second device.One thing that keeps hanging in my head that is bothering me. Although Jayme's cell phone was in the kitchen charging, I can't help but wonder if she had a burner phone or maybe friends old ipod or some way of accessing the internet that her parents didn't know about. A boyfriend could have given her a way to contact him so that her parents didn't find out. I took away my sons phone then found out his girlfriend while at school had given him an old phone so that he could get online and still talk to people. In my opinion this may be why the dogs were called in to look for additional cell phones or tablets etc... There could be an additional phone buried deep in a closet or anywhere. Again just my opinion.
Who said they did not bring a phone? What would lead you to think that they wore gloves? Its quite possible that, if Jayme was the target, he never took his hands off the gun. If he had a phone, there would be no way to identify him. Once they catch him and identify his phone, they will be able to show if he was in the area, but thats about it.
I've thought about this quite a bit as I personally believe the neighbours account to be accurate. So I think that either;The neighbors would have heard more than two shots then right?
Unknown, but I'd assume the perp left the same way he came in.I’ve been wondering was Jayme taken out the front door or back door?
I've thought about this quite a bit as I personally believe the neighbours account to be accurate. So I think that either;
- The perp used a shotgun. First shot passed through the door and killed James, second shot mortally wounded Denise.
- First shot went through the door, second killed James, and any other shots simply could not be heard by the neighbour as the perp was indoors.
I would guess that literally thousands of devices pinged that tower. Odds of tracking down the perp that way are about as good as going door to door.Cell towers will have a record of all phone numbers that routed through the towers at the time that Jayme was abducted. If the abductor's phone was turned on, and if the phone used a number that is registered to an owner, then it should be possible to narrow down the list of people in the area at the time of the abduction.
Who said they did not bring a phone? What would lead you to think that they wore gloves? Its quite possible that, if Jayme was the target, he never took his hands off the gun. If he had a phone, there would be no way to identify him. Once they catch him and identify his phone, they will be able to show if he was in the area, but thats about it.
If they thought the dog MIGHT have any DNA on it, the police would have had it examined before releasing it to the family. Its entirely possible that they did find blood from someone on the dog hair...Maybe they snipped a section of it, and we just don't know it because it wasn't visible to us at the time when family had the dog for their presser. I highly doubt they'd go back this long after the fact to get hair from the dog etc... but hey, who knows...Something kept nagging me about Jayme's dog, Molly being shaved. Others said it could be routine grooming and I get that. I guess what bothered me was why now? This families life has to be a 24/7 nightmare being pulled in a million directions, not to mention trying to reconcile the tragic deaths and missing niece. Yet they wanted he dog groomed in the midst of it? Possibly. I think it has more to do with evidence. Hair, saliva. urine, feces. Any of which could be on the perp/s, in their car, anywhere, without their knowledge.Not to mention Mollys' hair being tested. I started reading about animal DNA solving crimes and it is it's own science. The UK actually has it's own CODIS for it. I am truly hoping this is the case. Here is a link with a few examples for anyone interested. JMO
Pet CSI: How Dog And Cat DNA Nabs Bad Guys
How Animal DNA Puts Killers Behind Bars
Or...a list of active phones in the area around that time. Someone could have borrowed / stolen someone else's phone for this particular crime... or used a burner....Cell towers will have a record of all phone numbers that routed through the towers at the time that Jayme was abducted. If the abductor's phone was turned on, and if the phone used a number that is registered to an owner, then it should be possible to narrow down the list of people in the area at the time of the abduction.
YesDo we know that both parents were shot?
Sure they could, but pretty much every phone in Barron is going to ping off the same tower. The data is just that, a list of numbers. There is no location and no tracking of movement.Can they not locate phones hitting nearby tower at that time ?? Then confirm which phones ping other towers later in the morning?? Essentially tracking perp
Moving away ?? I think they can it’s just red tape and lag in getting info from each tower ??
I would guess that literally thousands of devices pinged that tower. Odds of tracking down the perp that way are about as good as going door to door.
A typical cellphone has enough power to reach a cell tower up to 45 miles away. Depending on the technology of the cellphone network, the maximum distance may be as low as 22 miles because the signal otherwise takes too long for the highly accurate timing of the cellphone protocol to work reliably.
So a tower will be able to receive pings for up to 45 miles away, thats a 90 mile circle.
Something kept nagging me about Jayme's dog, Molly being shaved. Others said it could be routine grooming and I get that. I guess what bothered me was why now? This families life has to be a 24/7 nightmare being pulled in a million directions, not to mention trying to reconcile the tragic deaths and missing niece. Yet they wanted he dog groomed in the midst of it? Possibly. I think it has more to do with evidence. Hair, saliva. urine, feces. Any of which could be on the perp/s, in their car, anywhere, without their knowledge.Not to mention Mollys' hair being tested. I started reading about animal DNA solving crimes and it is it's own science. The UK actually has it's own CODIS for it. I am truly hoping this is the case. Here is a link with a few examples for anyone interested. JMO
Pet CSI: How Dog And Cat DNA Nabs Bad Guys
How Animal DNA Puts Killers Behind Bars