I wonder if Jayme had a secret phone so didn’t mind leaving her main phone in the kitchen. In terms of a child being groomed and believing in some way that she wanted this to occur, the phone being left behind has irked me. As others have mentioned, she could be a victim of grooming insofar as she believed herself to be in a relationship with an older man, but not to the point of wanting this outcome and thus being taken forcably by the perpetrator, hurt that his heroic deed was not welcomed. In this scenario, her phone would have been left.
But if she had been groomed by someone she knew in person, for example someone she knew through church, it is possible he gave her a secret phone just for them to use and she has that. If she was groomed to the point of participating in this crime (as a groomed victim, a child, I am not stating I believe her to be a guilty perpetrator) then there may be scope to consider that the 911 call was part of creating a scene. If the neighbour’s timeline is right, the gap between the gunshots and the 911 call could certainly have been used to pack a bag, or calm an upset child, groom them further, get them on board. When everyging is ready, a staged call with Jayme shouting in the background, ensuring she is thought of as abducted before fleeing the scene wouldn’t be impossible.
I have been trying to look back at language used by LE in previous cases. In the case of Gypsy Blancharde, it seems that LE also designated her ‘missing and endangered’ rather than abducted when they still believed her to be 12 years old, though most of the links on websleuths from that time are now dead, so perhaps I am over analysing the way LE are referring to Jayme.
I find much of the language used in this case to be very interesting; her family are still using terms like ‘come home’. If anyone could point me towards media reports of cases of actual violent abduction, between the abduction and the discovery of the child, I would be interested to read how LE describes the case.
All MOO.