vlpate
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2009
- Messages
- 7,113
- Reaction score
- 2,935
She was aware of it happening, especially within the three weeks after it happened. They went to school together. Even though it was announced for some days, his friends knew. Remember, she *allegedly* went to the hospital instead of the wake because she was *allegedly* traumatized.Why would any responsible adult subject a child to LE questioning when they aren't even sure she was aware of what happened?
Crump is an attorney. He can question a witness and her statement would still be pristine. As we already know LE would not have given her the time of the day. Not sure it was rumor or a fact but wasn't it reported that one of her parents tried to call SPD and their call was unreturned? jmo
BEM: Please, how do we already know this? TIA
Attorney's do not investigate a case that is before a State Attorney. Her information should have gone to LE. In NO world is it any other way. Crump is not a party to this case, his expertise is the civil suit(s) that will eventually be filed in the future.
LE didn't know about her, how could they? The Martin's didn't eve know about her. There's not one bit of her story, as told by Crump, that makes a lick of sense. All this junk that's being said about the SPD and this case is outrageous. People are buying the bull from a known, unapologetic liar, Crump, and believing it, whether it makes sense or not.
If Crump would outright lie about a clandestine meeting involving a State Attorney, he would lie about anything, IMO