Witness Laura Buchanan Backs Out

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
WHy would Mort want info on half of the TES searchers who were LEGIT????

Looking for an angle even if it means throwing your witness under the bus.

I'm thinking if you are a liar yourself, and you surround yourself with liars, then maybe you assume the rest of the world are all liars also? JB seems to work on that agenda....
 
I'm thinking if you are a liar yourself, and you surround yourself with liars, then maybe you assume the rest of the world are all liars also? JB seems to work on that agenda....

It's all he has. The truth is just not working for him........:loser:
 
WHy would Mort want info on half of the TES searchers who were LEGIT????

Looking for an angle even if it means throwing your witness under the bus.
I agree...but if your witness doesn't pass muster...and they had a lot riding on her...why even come forward with her? I mean he must have known she wasn't reliable so why run the risk of resting all your eggs in her basket? But, I guess my gravest concern is that this witness has been manipulated by Baez and his merry cohorts into doing something i##egal!!
 
I agree...but if your witness doesn't pass muster...and they had a lot riding on her...why even come forward with her? I mean he must have known she wasn't reliable so why run the risk of resting all your eggs in her basket? But, I guess my gravest concern is that this witness has been manipulated by Baez and his merry cohorts into doing something i##egal!!

Still got him the Tes records and the ability to spout propoganda for over a year. I dont think this gal needed a lot of manipulating. The lengths she has apparently gone to "get involved" and stay involved say it all.
 
WHy would Mort want info on half of the TES searchers who were LEGIT????

Looking for an angle even if it means throwing your witness under the bus.

I think LB was handpicked by Cindy/DT to be thrown under the bus. Can you imagine Cindy's reaction when/if Mr. Nejame had shown her the emails from LB? I think they were trying to "use" each other.

I think I'm following your earlier post about Ray Brown, etc....

He looks like he could be a perfect fit:

http://www.lawyers.com/New-Jersey/Woodbridge/Raymond-M.-Brown-4769263-a.html
 
Perhaps there is some good that has come from Laura Buchanan?

I think that it has been made clear that if you would like to participate with the angel disguised as a human being; Tim Miller, in searching for a missing person:

You had better be truthful and follow the instructions given by Tim/Texas EquuSearch very carefully. Whatever Buchanan allegedly did or did not do, perhaps she actually ended up helping TES, in a different and unintended manner?

In this sort of a search group (or any group for that matter), it's really not a big stretch to presume a "bad apple"/rogue could potentially be among them. How to determine who is "clean" and who is not; isn't possible; for many obvious reasons. I love that one of the members here asks for help for Tim underneath her posts. Awesome!

However, now that TES has had first hand experience with an alleged "bad apple", could it be that TES has made changes relating to their spoken and written instructions?:

Something similar to: "with all due respect if you are here for any other reason other than to find a missing person please leave now" or please do not continue to fill out this form" and "if you are here for any other reason than to find a missing person and do not leave, we will find out".

I've returned the TES website; hoping that I could discover something that supported my theory but I was unable to find anything.

Does any of this make sense?

As an aside and OT, I have a terrible time conveying what is in my head into words.
 
Still got him the Tes records and the ability to spout propoganda for over a year. I dont think this gal needed a lot of manipulating. The lengths she has apparently gone to "get involved" and stay involved say it all.
Yup...she was ripe for the pick'in (have no idea why I'm talking in cliches :) that's for sure...but it seems like a really cr*ppy strategy. Plus, it opens them up to more scrutiny...especially their tactics to gain information. How long will the Court ignore what is going on? They keep getting more money to continue to "investigate".
 
After reading the depo and the transcripts of the phone calls I am just shocked! You see a whole other side to Laura in the phone transcripts than she portays herself in the depos.

It also shocked me how LDB & JA were spoken to like they were idiots by Laura's lawyer. Oh how I wish LB was going to take the stand and see her questioned again! I'd love to see her squirm on the screen.



What the hell was his problem? I didn't like that either and I don't see where it was necessary.
 
I blew the picture up as much as possible and saw that she gave a birth day of 1986. The 6 was hard to make out, but she would be no older than 25 years old.

I thought it read

old, born on March 14, 19??

I was thinking she meant she had a child around the same age
 
I think LB was handpicked by Cindy/DT to be thrown under the bus. Can you imagine Cindy's reaction when/if Mr. Nejame had shown her the emails from LB? I think they were trying to "use" each other.

I think I'm following your earlier post about Ray Brown, etc....

He looks like he could be a perfect fit:

http://www.lawyers.com/New-Jersey/Woodbridge/Raymond-M.-Brown-4769263-a.html



OMG.......... He looks just like John Waters.
john-waters.jpgclick to enlarge pic of John

lawyer-raymond-m-brown-photo-367280.jpgclick to enlarge pic of Ray



I am laughing so hard right now. I just don't know why. Wait...yes I do.........
We think alike.

I am pretty open minded....but I find it VERY HARD TO BELIEVE that LB didn't get help from someone in retaining Mr. Brown as counsel. VERY HARD.
 
I thought it read

old, born on March 14, 19??

I was thinking she meant she had a child around the same age

I read the year as 1986. I'm not good at uploading photos, so I hope this works.

LEtterpic.jpg
 
To read that "controlled call" from Kaspar to LB.....WOWSERS. She is either on crack, mentally off, or something because she cannot finish one incoherent thought. I just wonder what her CPA husband thinks about all of this?

I know. I just kept going back and going back to reread and try and make sense of it all.
 
I didn't realize this thread was here. I wish I could move my post over from the Doc Dump thread. After reading several of her emails to MN.....I thought we all were being punked.

But just about died laughing at her comment of "the public should take up money to buy GA & CA an 8' high fence as the less they are seen the better"! Tee hee hee

That was in the emails to MN? I thought I read all of those last night but don't remember that.
 
OMG.......... He looks just like John Waters.
View attachment 13538click to enlarge pic of John

View attachment 13539click to enlarge pic of Ray



I am laughing so hard right now. I just don't know why. Wait...yes I do.........
We think alike.

I am pretty open minded....but I find it VERY HARD TO BELIEVE that LB didn't get help from someone in retaining Mr. Brown as counsel. VERY HARD.

This has really piqued my curiosity: http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/courtmotionsTQS.pdf

In this document - http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/TxEQSworkers2.pdf we have 2 new case numbers 10-86155 and on page 2, handwritten, upper right corner 10-86122. The plot thickens....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
135
Guests online
246
Total visitors
381

Forum statistics

Threads
609,145
Messages
18,250,117
Members
234,549
Latest member
raymehay
Back
Top