Funny, she just wants the DETAILS of their accusations. That's so horrible of her wanting details so she can DEFEND herself against the false claims the Zahaus charged her with, isn't it? What? Don't the Zahaus have answers, or have they not INVENTED them yet?
FUNNY I don't see any substantiation or proof from Dina that Zahaus "invented" anything.
Good luck finding a jury that are gullible enough to believe Dina's BS.
(KZ notes-- a couple things are inaccurate in this article-- spelled Nina's last name "Romano" incorrectly as "Romero." Also stated RZ bound her hands behind her neck-- also inaccurate. Comments following article are interesting. One is from a former co-worker of RZ. Copy of the 9 page complaint is included in the article.)
http://www.azcentral.com/story/mone...rs-lambast-lawsuit-coronado-hanging/17803753/
Dina Shacknai commissioned her own investigation a year after his death that concluded Max was beaten and either pushed or was thrown over the bannister. Dina Shacknai did not name a suspect, but said he was assaulted at a time when Zahau and one other person was at the home.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/mone...rs-lambast-lawsuit-coronado-hanging/17803753/
Dina's proof will come during the trial.
Good luck finding a jury that believes rumor and speculation over forensic evidence and testimoney from the detectives that worked on the case. Maybe the jury will have a movie day and see scenes from The Housemaid as a break from DNA and fingerprint testimony.
As for juries... I live ten thousand miles away from the Shacknai home. I have absolutely NO reason to feel invested in this case, on a personal basis. But if I was local, and on that jury, hearing all the details of this case for the first time? I'd arrive at the exact same conclusion I already did, on reading the details of Rebecca's obvious murder for the first time (which was that it was murder, not WHO murdered her, that came later...). I hope the actual jury have the wherewithal to do the same, see through all the blah and name this crime for what it is.
And I hope, if that's at all possible, that this court case leads to a proper, independent investigation of this crime and everyone connected to it.
I think Dr. Brad Peterson, Chief of the Rady PICU, is almost certain to be called as a witness in the wrongful death suit. Of all the depositions, his is one of the ones I'm keenly interested in.
The other interesting question is, which side will call him first?! Will he be on Dina's witness list, or the Zahau witness list?
IMO, either what he said to Dina, or the way she interpreted it, became a motive for hurting Rebecca.
I think there will be other medical professionals called as witnesses that cared for Max, too, to provide context for a motive to hurt Rebecca. The judge will have a difficult job trying to prevent Rebecca's wrongful death suit from becoming a de facto Max Shacknai case, IMO. The defense will try, IMO, their hardest to turn the case from what happened to Rebecca, to "Rebecca and/ or X hurt Max". But that could backfire, if the jury senses that the anger/ jealousy Dina felt toward Rebecca played into motive. So, it will be interesting to see how that plays out from Dina's defense attorney.
I feel pretty certain Jonah Shacknai will be called as a witness, too. But I think he will try hard to get out of it, if he can. It will be interesting to see if he supports his brother and ex-wife, and ex-SIL, if he is deposed/ testifies. I actually think he might, if compelled to testify-- just to make it all go away. I don't think there is any way to support his brother, and not support Dina and her sister. IDK. Jonah is a wild card in all this. No telling which way the wind will blow until it happens, I suppose.
Oh yeah-- Paul Pfingst, too. That will be interesting.
I don't believe in wild conspiracy theories, and payoffs that involved the SDSO, CPO, FBI, Department of Justice, the Medical Examiner, and the California Attorney General. I believe in FORENSIC evidence, and that's what anyone on the jury will be looking at too. If the Zahaus believe all these agencies were paid off - let's see them PROVE IT...
[modsnip]
Dina's proof will come during the trial.
Good luck finding a jury that believes rumor and speculation over forensic evidence and testimoney from the detectives that worked on the case. Maybe the jury will have a movie day and see scenes from The Housemaid as a break from DNA and fingerprint testimony.
That seems unlikely. There's no evidence the movie you name was the property of Rebecca, nor that she viewed it at any time. If that's the only evidence Dina's attorneys have, they don't have a strong defense.
Keep in mind, Dina, her sister and Adam Shacknai are the ones on trial here, not Rebecca. Again, that brings us to the old question, if Dina is so convinced Rebecca killed her son, why didn't she pursue a civil case against RZ's estate?
ALLEGATIONS OF SPECIFIC ACTS ATTRIBUTED TO EACH DEFENDANT
13. Due to DINA’s prior incidents of confronting and threatening DECEDENT, DINA’s prior history of being unable to control her anger, her Due to DINA’s prior incidents of confronting and threatening her ridiculing and publicly demeaning the DECEDENT for allegedly causing harm and the eventual death of DINA’s six-year-old son, Maxfield, as well as her extreme jealousy over the DECEDENT’s relationship with her ex-husband, Jonah Shacknai,Plaintiffs allege, based in further part on an eye witness report placing DINA at the 1040 Ocean Boulevard residence the evening of the murder, that on the evening of July 12, 2011, DINA aggressively confronted the DECEDENT at the Ocean Boulevard residence, along with her sister, NINA. This confrontation arose from an accident the prior day when DINA’s son Maxfield fell over a second floor railing at the Ocean Boulevard residence, causing him brain damage and eventually his death on July 16, 2011. DECEDENT was babysitting Maxfield at the time of the fall.
http://media.nbcbayarea.com/documents/Zahau-Amended-Complaint.pdf
Do you have a link to this alleged "fact", Mary and her lawyers like to keep the fact that Doug is POLICE a big secret? TIA
LuckyLucy2,
I'm not KZ, however Dina feeling jealousy and anger towards Rebecca was included by the lawyers in the Second Amended Complaint.