That’s incredible. Great find!Does anyone else think they might want to consider looking in the area of "The Zone of Death" if nothing shows up in Grand Tetons? It is located just outside Grand Tetons National Park, where they were last seen, on the Idaho side of Yellowstone National Park.
This stretch of Yellowstone National Park presents a unique loophole. It has been refered to by Brian Kalt in the Georgetown Law Journal as "The Zone of Death" when he wrote a piece called 'The Perfect Crime.'
Trials in Yellowstone National Park would be held at the federal courthouse in Cheyenne, Wyoming. However, in the 6th amendment it decrees that juries in federal criminal cases must be made up of citizens who are from both the district AND state where the crime was committed. This is where the loophole comes in, that area of the park in Idaho would have to be tried before a jury consisting entirely of residents of that area, and the trial would also have to take place in that area. Unfortunately, that Idaho portion of the park is uninhabited, making it impossible to make up a jury of residents of both the state and district. Any defendant facing a felony or misdemeanor charge would be unable to receive a constitutional trial which could not be legally punished regardless of guilt or innocence according to Brian Kalts writing.
I mention this because Brian and Gabby both seemed to be avided readers, they had books with them such as Lullaby, The Zodiac Killer, Fight Club etc. There is a great thriller book by CJ Box called 'Free Fire' it is based in this particular stretch of Yellowstone National Park and CJ Box even consulted Brian Kalt when writing his book. As it definitely falls into the genre that they seemed to enjoy reading and it was based in an area they planned to travel to, I wonder if one or both of them could have read that book.
Brian also seemed to be very aware of his legal rights and I wonder if it was premeditated could he have known about this strange loophole in that stretch of forest? Of course, this is all speculation and purely based on the genre of some of the books they were reading along with the very close proximity to where she went missing, it's a stretch but also an interesting coincidence. I hope something turns up or someone eventually cracks and her family can have some type of closure.
How about what was the mindset of Brian when he last saw Gabby?Unraveling Gabby Petito mystery: Legal experts say looking into her mindset could lead to bringing Gabby home | WFLA
Investigators describe this case as unraveling a mystery with many pieces to this puzzle.
“It is a mystery in the truest sense because you have no idea. You can’t go into a situation like this assuming you know how it’s going to play out because, really, you don’t,” said private investigator, John Allman.
He says, right now, one of the biggest questions that needs answering is what was the mindset of Gabby when she was last seen.
“By trying to understand the mindset of an individual when they were last seen by people is critical because it can tell you if they have been looking to escape, to go somewhere by themselves,” Allman asked.
The former investigative reporter also knows that in asking the question, where’s Gabby, there are many possible answers.
Former federal prosecutor Stephen Crawford agrees.
The longtime Tampa attorney, now in private practice, says there’s a lot of work for detectives.
He also said since Gabby’s fiancé is simply a person of interest and has hired an attorney, the young man cannot be compelled to talk.
“This is a case that if it turns out, unfortunately, the way it’s looking, it’ll be prosecuted locally wherever they find what they find,” said Crawford.
Yes. They apparently shared an interest in the author and both tried to monetize their interest in Palahniuk with related art/items in their respective Depop shops.I was unfamiliar with Chuck Palahniuk but realize that he is the author of Fight Club.
Gabby had Fight Club related items sold from her online shop. So they may have shared the interest. Creepy but maybe not significant.
Okay, just looked the book up. Not really a serial killer book but more magik (and rather stupid):
Lullaby (Palahniuk novel) - Wikipedia
I was unfamiliar with Chuck Palahniuk but realize that he is the author of Fight Club.
Gabby had Fight Club related items sold from her online shop. So they may have shared the interest. Creepy but maybe not significant.
I agree with much of your post. However Gabby's mom did speak to her on the phone on Aug 24th or 25th. Some said they even face timed. That is the last day her Mom is certain she was OK.Hey. Long time reader/lurker…lifetime researcher.
I’ve been consumed by this for days. For reasons I may elaborate in the future but for the time being…this whole saga and where it has occurred is so familiar to me.
The altercation at Moonflower on the 12th. I have no speculation on what precipitated it but, I strongly feel this is where things went seriously wrong.
from the police report and the (limited) witness (singular!) report that has been made public, they were arguing over a phone and/or possession of the van at Moonflower on the 12th. (Police report does not mention the moonflower specifically but does mention coordinates that exactly align with that location)
they left the moonflower and proceeded north towards Arches National Park where they were pulled over. Policeman took BL to Seekhaven (we’re assuming he went to another location for the evening from there) and GP was left with possession of her van.
…reminder this was the evening of August 12th.
The 12th was also the day the IG posts of both GP and BL became suspicious. His..referring only to himself with bad camera angles…and *her’s becoming rambling (typical of him, not her).
there’s also essentially radio silence on their SM between the 12th and at least the 21st.
something BIG….
… BIG.BAD.WRONG….
happened with them between the 12th and (at the very least) the 17th (when he supposedly flew from SLC to FL.
*edited only the word here’s to her’s.
I'd really like to see LE release surveillance footage of their exit from the Fairfield Inn. That shouldn't muddy the case at all and at this point, it'd be worthwhile to ascertain that is for sure is Brian there with her.OR was it an entirely different guy w/ Gabby?
crazier by the hour indeed…
I’ve been consumed by this for days. For reasons I may elaborate in the future but for the time being…this whole saga and where it has occurred is so familiar to me.
The altercation at Moonflower on the 12th. I have no speculation on what precipitated it but, I strongly feel this is where things went seriously wrong.
from the police report and the (limited) witness (singular!) report that has been made public, they were arguing over a phone and/or possession of the van at Moonflower on the 12th. (Police report does not mention the moonflower specifically but does mention coordinates that exactly align with that location)
they left the moonflower and proceeded north towards Arches National Park where they were pulled over. Policeman took BL to Seekhaven (we’re assuming he went to another location for the evening from there) and GP was left with possession of her van.
…reminder this was the evening of August 12th.
The 12th was also the day the IG posts of both GP and BL became suspicious. His..referring only to himself with bad camera angles…and here’s becoming rambling (typical of him, not her).
there’s also essentially radio silence on their SM between the 12th and at least the 21st.
something BIG….
… BIG.BAD.WRONG….
happened with them between the 12th and (at the very least) the 17th (when he supposedly flew from SLC to FL.
I keep thinking the same thing every time I consider the weird storage unit story. Surely a dad devoted enough to move his entire life to be closer to his child would gladly help transfer her belongings across town. And even if BL had the only key to the unit, spending $40 to FedEx it to the dads makes more sense than spending hundreds to fly home mid road trip.
I guess that’s why I don’t think the storage unit was the real reason for BL jetting home.
IMO.
I’m pretty sure LE has found some good evidence because naming him a POI so early on is very telling IMO.
Certainly that is possible, and while one does not have to assume if he had killed her he would be rational, it seems a lot more rational to simply bury the body in the wilderness. Those are very large areas with some very far off the beaten path. Burying or just hiding a body there would be less risky than driving near 2,000 miles with a body
Really. He flies home, she - what? - begs him to come back so he flies back, kills her and drives her van back to Florida? Or, she begs him to come back, he does, they fight more, decide to call it off an return to Florida, together, some big blowup happens and he kills her on the journey home? That's the only way him driving that van back there makes any "sense" to me.
Manic can range from the highest of highs to incredible lows - sobbing uncontrollably isn't out of the question, especially amidst a blow-up that quickly turned into a police matter.My comment on the police report discussing Gabby's mental health - being manic wouldn't include violently sobbing to the point someone else needs to 'speak' for you.
Really. He flies home, she - what? - begs him to come back so he flies back, kills her and drives her van back to Florida? Or, she begs him to come back, he does, they fight more, decide to call it off an return to Florida, together, some big blowup happens and he kills her on the journey home? That's the only way him driving that van back there makes any "sense" to me.
Strategy behind the person of interest not talking in Gabby Petito case
“I think a lot of people think if someone asserts the fifth amendment, the right to remain silent, or the sixth amendment, the right to have an attorney, that they're hiding something” says defense attorney Greg Skordas, who has no involvement in this case.
Skordas says from a legal standpoint not talking has its advantages.
“I think it's smart for this attorney to say look my client is not hiding anything I'm advising him not to speak at this time and he's willing to follow my advice at this time” Skordas says.
Skordas says there can be a time when a person of interest will want to talk to police adding “he's not saying we won't give a statement ever maybe down the road there will come a time when there will be some quid pro quo and they'll talk with the government and say look we'll give a statement but we want some concessions as to what that will do and how that will be used in the case.”
Who paid for Gabby's hotel room for the week? Budget travelers usually do not have resources for a week in a hotel, especially if they're continuing on the trip. If she stayed for a week at that hotel by the airport, wouldn't that be at least $100 a night with taxes?
However, 'person of interest' does not have the same meaning as 'suspect'. What it really means, IMO, is someone who police are interested in interviewing, who potentially possesses critical information.Completely agree. They don’t just specifically name a POI because of circumstantial evidence…..usually they have already built up quite the case file on the subject….maybe not enough to bring to court. Not just yet. But enough that it’s very close. POI specifically named publicly is not a move done lightly by LE imo.