I prefaced it aknowledging it was going down the rabbit hole. Those aren't positions, those are questions. Positions are statements. Not open ended. Statements she gave WERE odd, IMO. You're welcome to address them individually if you'd like.
Ironic that you later make the claim I'm ignoring all circumstantial evidence and preceed that with a claim that's entirely circumstantial. Christopher made a statement saying he saw her repeatedly hitting him in the arm. Not "aggresively trying to keep her place in the camper" as you just fabricated. You're assuming you know what was going through her head at that moment, care to explain how? And also, can you tell us how you know beyond a shadow of a doubt she was abandoned in the end? Last time I checked, none of us know for sure. You can guess, but a guess isn't facts. It's a guess.
I definitely conceded that prior to even saying it, so that kind of answers itself. It wasn't so much a statement as to "why I think he's innocent", as it was just odd, and would be entirely congruent with facts of the case if he were to have left her there thinking she was alive still. Can you prove to me he knew she was dead at that time? Last time I checked, we don't have that info yet. Another guess.
I get that. I said that. Nothing you're saying here wasn't pre-acknowledged per my own post. Doesn't really change the fact that a text that was considered non-essential, still could be odd for reasons I can't go into on this site apparently.
Did you see him there, or did you just see a door close? Her van being parked near where her body was found doesn't mean automatic guilt for BL. You act like he was standing beside the van waving as the camper passed by. For all we know he had already left after a fight and was sleeping on the tarp, which led to him being picked up by the hitchhiker on the 29th. Stop pretending like you have all the facts because the last time I checked the police either don't even know themselves, or they haven't released that info. Can you tell us if Gabby was actually dead prior to him going hitchhiking? How do you know she wasn't alive prior to him leaving, and then he turns to come back and finds her dead and panics?
You could be right, but you could also be wrong.
You're exactly who I'm talking about when I said people who pretend to know exactly what happened. You can have your opinion based off your perceptions, but don't delude yourself into thinking that that somehow makes it a fact.
Not the same investigators, not the same case. "how it's done now" lol can you show me the policy change? The smartest thing you said in this entire post was to add the "imo" at the end of that sentence. You're entitled to your opinion about it, but personally I think if they had enough evidence for probable cause they would have charged him by now. The fact that the autopsy has taken place and there are still no charges shows their either waiting for second opinions or there is no evidence in the autopsy report that links BL to her death. Who knows, they could charge him tomorrow though. The point is, as of this moment, they still haven't. The more time that passes, the less likely it'll happen unless some new witness or key piece of evidence surfaces.
Zero supporting evidence? lol That's actually funny, considering you're the one ignoring FOUR separate accounts of GP initiating violence with BL. GP, BL, Christopher and Rose. ALL four have said GP assaulted BL. Between the two of us I'm the at least trying to be objective about this and actually consider all sides.
Do you know what a tangent is? No one went on a tangent. Everything I said directly relates to this case. I pointed out specific facts that appeared odd, imo, and not congruent with the narrative people like you are desperately pushing prior to actually knowing. The fact that you are selectively ignoring the whole "rabbit hole" preface prior to that part is a you problem. Ignoring certain aspects that don't fit a preconceived narrative appears to be a theme with you though.
Do you consider any post you disagree with as tangents? That's incredibly toxic. Isn't that the same as people describing GP as acting "crazy" in the body cam? Mischaracterizing something I said to try and improve upon your own point is a sign of a weak argument.
Thank you for pointing out he evidence is circumstantial btw, that just means evidence by inference. Thank god we don't find people guilty based on circumstantial evidence in this country. Just imagine for a second that GP died accidentally, and BL ends up killing himself because of this social media lynch mob. That would make you, and people like you, complicit. I'll hold my judgment for further information.