faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
no way did caylee describe this dog. my daughter will be 3 next month and she can't tell me anything about a dog other than it's a "puppy dog"
she's of average intelligence and the only colors she knows are pink and yellow because those are her favorite colors.
kids that age aren't interesting in learning about the dog.. they just want to play with it. all they know is that it licks and bites.
i think cindy is full of poop. (shocker, i know)
Agreed. I had had my 2 1/2 year old niece at my house for a week with my 3 small dogs. She know's doggies. She knows "Bobo" (her grandmothers similar dog). By the end of the week while she may have known individual dog names she certainly could not diferentiate which dogs went to which household or person. She is still, 3 weeks later wandering around her own house calling out for my cat.
Caylee encountered a dog somewhere. She probably had enough contact to know it was a nice dog. Anything beyond that is the adult leading and feeding her (" Was it Zanny's dog?" "Was it white?" etc). There is no other credible evidence nor any other information that can be taken from what CA says about the dog conversation. At least nothing about Zanny or caylee.
What it does however is says alot about CA as far as any testimony from her goes. She has now sworn under oath that she believes her daughter that ZFG exists, it just isn't the one suing her daughter. Yet the only sign that such a person exists, that did not come exclusively from KC's mouth is a vague "doggy" statement that was coached out of a 2 year old. And that is the basis for her fanatical beliefs. Uhhuh. Even more telling as others have said is that CA was obviously asking questions, and the doggy answer was the only one she got. So even back then she obviously was not believing any of this.