I wouldn't go quite so far as to call it frivolous. But the timing of the suit, and the timing of its depositions are, IMO, rather suspicious.
It seems all I've heard all my adult life, generally speaking, is how "people suing about everything is costing us all money! That's why your insurance rates go up! Plaintiffs' lawyers are the scum of the earth! Some of them even advertise! When one of these people (personal injury plaintiffs) wins money it comes out of all our pockets!"
I used to buy into that. But I don't anymore, because I got a look at some history of how it was in the so-called "good old days" when "scum" weren't "bringing lawsuits right and left." And, frankly, I have come to realize that insurance companies aren't exactly hurting financially. Quite the contrary.
But I think much of the public still holds that tunnel-vision, shortsighted viewpoint--that personal injury lawsuits (such as defamation suits) are "Satan's handiwork" or whatever. (The public never sees it when the multi-million dollar jury award invariably gets reduced way, way, way down by appellate judges--and insurance companies and many other defendants have the money to keep the litigation and appeals going forever. All the public sees is "woman burned by coffee gets awarded megabucks!" If the woman had to have skin grafts in her crotch, well, she should just get over it. And yes, she was foolish to put a styrofoam cup between her legs.)
So it surprises me to see so many people who are so supportive of silly Zenaida and her lawsuit about her defamation, which was caused by a desperate murderer (IMO) making up a fictional character to save her own murdering (IMO) hide. Yes, Zenaida was hurt, to some extent, by KC's lies. But... the damage to Z. was not unlimited. Shouldn't she just "get over it?" Because, you know, some insurance company might have to pay her! (People would be amazed at the things that are sometimes covered by homeowners' policies.)
I think the lawsuit is a gift to the prosecution. I think Z. should be compensated, and in fact they should've just paid her the 15 grand and been done with it. I think it would've been worth that comparatively small sum to them, to not have to go through this stuff. As we know, the Anthonys, being a little "off" themselves, are not up to fighting this small battle in the midst of the big battle they feel they have to fight. In the end, anything that helps put Caylee's murderer in the slammer is ok with me.
But people should remember that, as far as we know, Cindy and George committed no crimes. I know they may have committed crimes to cover up what their daughter (IMO) did, but before Caylee's murder, to my knowledge, Cindy and George committed no crimes. I feel a bit guilty watching them go through this, but I do realize that KC and her antics are to some extent the result of their own crazy or negligent behavior.