Phoenixfla
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 550
- Reaction score
- 0
They can't get around that, he has to legally waive that right before they can speak to him without an Attorney.
Unless he is no longer facing charges.
They can't get around that, he has to legally waive that right before they can speak to him without an Attorney.
Even if he is unrepresented, the SA's office cannot speak to him unless he executes a specific waiver of his right to Councel, otherwise that is denying him his Miranda rights
You have a right to remain silent
You have a right to an Attorney ect..
They can't get around that, he has to legally waive that right before they can speak to him without an Attorney.
Then we circle back to the original question which IS IF there is actual evidence that exists, that shows definitively that GZ was actually in a severe life and death struggle when he shot, WHY would you not avoid the media and the rally's and all the other bruha, and simply show it so that all of this could be avoided and life could go on? Why would anyone deliberatly subject themselves to this if they have the evidence and proof?
I don't believe that they would, I believe that if that proof actually existed that it would have been front and center while everyone in GZ's family and friend circle and their dog was out trying to clear his name and convince everyone of his innocence..IMO JMHO and stuff.
Thankfully the justice system is not set up where one has to prove their innocence.
Even if he is unrepresented, the SA's office cannot speak to him unless he executes a specific waiver of his right to Councel, otherwise that is denying him his Miranda rights
You have a right to remain silent
You have a right to an Attorney ect..
They can't get around that, he has to legally waive that right before they can speak to him without an Attorney.
I have never seen anyone come out to defend themselves while a case is still under investigation.Any actual evidence that exists is in the hands of investigation where it should be,not the front page of a newspaper just so those in the public whose questions have not been answered are satisfied.In most investigations parents are not told all of whats going on until the investigation is over.JMO
Thankfully the justice system is not set up where one has to prove their innocence.
What everyone wants him to show, at least by a proponderance of the evidence is that the amount of force he used, in this case deadly force was in fact appropriate to the circumstances.
ITA...all this took place over the phone. GZ's hiding, has been since day two probably...can he waive his legal rights over the phone? I'm guessing he can as long as the SA has it recorded or else there's no proof...and a good attorney will get that thrown out...under a technicality...
I'm truly wondering if this 72 hour wait has to do with ACory giving GZ time to turn himself in peacefully...
I believe ACory has access to the autopsy report and can't wait to see that myself. That will be the driving force to charge GZ or not..along with the alleged racial slur..if that is heard, his charge would be elevated...and his account of things must match the evidence she uncovers..if its found he did not follow the dispatchers instructions to not follow, that turns his defense in the opposite direction..then the rest would be gravy...
Turn himself in for what? I can't see Cory telling some one that, "hey, we're gonna arrest you in 72 hours".
Until the rally's and the media coverage, the investigation WAS over.
I have never seen anyone come out to defend themselves while a case is still under investigation.Any actual evidence that exists is in the hands of investigation where it should be,not the front page of a newspaper just so those in the public whose questions have not been answered are satisfied.In most investigations parents are not told all of whats going on until the investigation is over.JMO
Turn himself in for what? I can't see Cory telling some one that, "hey, we're gonna arrest you in 72 hours".
Does this make any sense?
If the Special Prosecutor was not planning on charging George Zimmerman she could have talked to him all he wanted to.
I think because she refused to talk to him it means charges are coming.
You haven't?
I have, just to name a few;
Scott Peterson
Drew Peterson
Joran Van Der Sloot
JMHO
Does this make any sense?
If the Special Prosecutor was not planning on charging George Zimmerman she could have talked to him all he wanted to.
I think because she refused to talk to him it means charges are coming.
Why not? Are people not given notice like that, to either turn themselves in or be arrested?