[/B]
Well, I have tried to point this out in the past. The defense wants everyone to think they are stupid and they want everyone to look at other things than Kc. The defense knows that sooner or later they will get all pertinent information out of Tes. Tes is not above justice. Strategy. IMO
I'm not going to get into a name calling session or anything of that nature. What I am going to look at is what the defense has done and the work product they have submitted.
Many of the motions filed by the defense have been flawed in accordance with Florida laws. The defense has also failed on different occasions to follow court orders. JB has been politely called out in court by the Judge on a few occasions. The defense has not completed many parts of their investigation. The defense has also failed to pay the clerk of courts office for records during this case as well. To me this shows a lack of experience, effort, and understanding on part of the defense.
JB is inexperienced. Thats not name calling that's truth. JB does not have much trial experience especially a trial of this magnitude.
AL and LKB may not have a complete understanding of Florida law. I believe many of the motions show good examples of this. These motions have been discussed and the flaws pointed out if anyone would like to go back to look for reference.
The defense has also shown a lack of effort by not paying for items they received, not completing depo's, not completing their review of the evidence, not going in to look at the crime scene after it was released to them, not paying Nejame and going to his office to review these files, not submitting evidence to back statements made by Todd M, not swearing in RK's ex's, and the list could go on.
Based on the work produced by this defense many have questioned if Casey could appeal on the grounds of ineffective counsel. In fact I believe that was a major reason JS wanted Casey out all hearings. I also recall JS asking Casey if she was pleased with her counsel.
To me this defense has not shown it's effectiveness but there are two key points that are keeping that from being a valid appeal. One: the high profile attorneys involved, and Two: Casey's willingness to stick with them.
So I'm not going to say they are stupid but clearly they are lacking in experience, knowledge, and effort based on their work thus far in the case. This motion is just another example of that because this issue has already been ruled on, and instead of arguing against that ruling they are rehashing the first motion with the addition of the press was allowed to see the files. It should be noted they were not copied in anyway.
ther_beatingA_Dead 
