2010.06.01 Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
didn't the new judge rule that she didn't have to be present @ each hearing from now on if she doesn't want to. i think this new judge reversed JSS ruling on this (which i believe was put into place to eliminate this very thing of having rulings reversed on appeal as she could claim she wasn't present and defense didn't act on her behalf).
 
Want to block prosecution's ability to see how the money is spent.
 
I have no sound here at work but who is Baez texting I wonder? And when did they switch sides?? Been a while since I watched a hearing...........

If u are able to watch it, In Session has it. I imagine KC sitting in her cell with a phone under her pillow to get JB's text. I betcha someone is there with her that can get his text & relay them to her.
 
CM--Chapter 119 provides for the protection of witnesses, chap 119.11 sub paragraph 3d and C5.
Wants JP to rule eventually on constitutionality of this statute if it gets to that.

Mentions bids from roadwork apply but when a life is involved the statute doesn't apply.

Wants to take experts into the jail and identity of that person kept from the public until and if they're on a witness list.
 
Everytime CM speaks, I feel like I'm going to fall asleep. Too monotone, I guess. Does anyone else hear BP's nose whistling into the microphone (I'm listening to click). He's cute as a button, in my opinion.
 
The prison is paid for by the very kind Florida taxpayers. If taxpayers want to know who is visiting KC, they should be allowed to see the list.
 
Who said they waived it? CM or the judge? Maybe she's sick...or more likely freaked out that she didn't want to hear more about the death penalty. Maybe because these have already been argued in front of JS?
 
Side bar now, I wonder if Judge Perry is inquiring to why the defendant is not in court.
 
CM--Chapter 119 provides for the protection of witnesses, chap 119.11 sub paragraph 3d and C5.
Wants JP to rule eventually on constitutionality of this statute if it gets to that.

Mentions bids from roadwork apply but when a life is involved the statute doesn't apply.

Wants to take experts into the jail and identity of that person kept from the public until and if they're on a witness list.

That would be okay with me IF SHE WASN'T INDIGENT AND THE STATE WASN'T FOOTING THE DANG BILL! Grrrrrr....
 
Here is the statute:

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes...TM&Title=->2009->Ch0119->Section 011#0119.011

3)(a) "Criminal intelligence information" means information with respect to an identifiable person or group of persons collected by a criminal justice agency in an effort to anticipate, prevent, or monitor possible criminal activity.

(c) "Criminal intelligence information" and "criminal investigative information" shall not include:

5. Documents given or required by law or agency rule to be given to the person arrested, except as provided in s. 119.071(2)(h), and, except that the court in a criminal case may order that certain information required by law or agency rule to be given to the person arrested be maintained in a confidential manner and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) until released at trial if it is found that the release of such information would:
 
Who said they waived it? CM or the judge? Maybe she's sick...or more likely freaked out that she didn't want to hear more about the death penalty. Maybe because these have already been argued in front of JS?


JP asked if the attorney for the defense was waiving his client's presence. Reply was affirmative.

I thought her presence couldn't be waived according to prior ruling by JS???
 
didn't the new judge rule that she didn't have to be present @ each hearing from now on if she doesn't want to. i think this new judge reversed JSS ruling on this (which i believe was put into place to eliminate this very thing of having rulings reversed on appeal as she could claim she wasn't present and defense didn't act on her behalf).

Nope, he agreed with JS. Said except for status hearings she had to be her.
 
didn't the new judge rule that she didn't have to be present @ each hearing from now on if she doesn't want to. i think this new judge reversed JSS ruling on this (which i believe was put into place to eliminate this very thing of having rulings reversed on appeal as she could claim she wasn't present and defense didn't act on her behalf).

I very well thought that SHE had to present at every hearing and that motion for it to be optional to be there was denied. Judge Perry said he didn't want any problems with an appeal bc she wasn't at the hearings.
 
Let's discuss the hearing and keep the conversation constructive.

KC is not at court today and the judge acknowledged it right away. That's all we know for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
233
Guests online
514
Total visitors
747

Forum statistics

Threads
625,767
Messages
18,509,531
Members
240,839
Latest member
Mrs.KatSmiff
Back
Top