- Joined
- Jul 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,451
- Reaction score
- 15,923
I saw nothing to restrain TH from seeing her son. Did I miss it?
no, i'm guessing the his father would have to fill one out, due to maybe the attempt to hire hitman..
I saw nothing to restrain TH from seeing her son. Did I miss it?
I am still rather surprised that a judge signed that based on that form alone, shouldn't there be something from LE stating his statements of LE's probable cause are true? Even the lawyer's letter doesn't mention LE so KH's statements are not really substantiated by anyone from what I have seen released.
I saw nothing to restrain TH from seeing her son. Did I miss it?
I saw nothing to restrain TH from seeing her son. Did I miss it?
Yes you missed it. It's under "Parenting time". A block to check:
No parenting time
supervised parenting time
parenting time as follows {days of week}
No parenting time is checked
Yes you missed it. It's under "Parenting time". A block to check:
No parenting time
supervised parenting time
parenting time as follows {days of week}
No parenting time is checked
Yes you missed it. It's under "Parenting time". A block to check:
No parenting time
supervised parenting time
parenting time as follows {days of week}
No parenting time is checked
BUT, the RO listed only the little girl, not the son.
Good eye! It does appear to be different handwriting...
Did his attorney insert that to add some oomph to the petition?
I would bet this was done intentionally to help protect the documents from the public and media searching for them. That is not the first time I have heard the last name mixed up as Horton instead of Horman. JMO
I assume it would "sit well" with you if he were a scatter-brained weakling? KH is handling his business in a very honorable and BRAVE fashion in the face of all he has been confronted with over the last month+.
I am still rather surprised that a judge signed that based on that form alone, shouldn't there be something from LE stating his statements of LE's probable cause are true? Even the lawyer's letter doesn't mention LE so KH's statements are not really substantiated by anyone from what I have seen released.
Yes you missed it. It's under "Parenting time". A block to check:
No parenting time
supervised parenting time
parenting time as follows {days of week}
No parenting time is checked
They also did not black out any phone numbers.
I have a feeling Terri may be disconnecting hers in the near future with the number of fans she has. :waitasec:
I think Trident was referring to Terri's OTHER son, from her previous marriage. Not Kyron. Trident - correct me if I'm wrong.
Could KH's statement on the application be supported with other documentation from LE that does not have to be released to the public? If so, there could be LE information that supports KH's assertion in the petition that we are still not privy to.
I don't know if judges consider only the petition when making decisions on restraining orders - does anyone know?
BUT, the RO listed only the little girl, not the son.
That puts her in a terrible position.
IF she is innocent, then she is probably reluctant to change her number on the slim hope that Kyron might call her.
Patty Wetterling has said that she and her husband have maintained the same phone number all these years, just in case Jacob might call.
But with her phone number released like that, I'm sure she will be getting some really scary calls from people who are convinced she's guilty of everything including global warming.