2010.06.28 - Kyron's Dad files for divorce and restraining order

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,701
If she asks for money for having taken care of Kyron all those years, I will lose my mind.
 
  • #2,702
There is no proof Terri did anything, and her affair started after her husband left her. In this instance then, using your example here, it is a sound business decision to give someone your car for 10,000.

If she has been charged and out on bond, I could see the argument that she's got nerve asking for support. It isn't about what's appalling, it's about what is legal for a woman in the State of Oregon being thrown out of the family home to expect from the spouse doing the throwing.

We can be appalled in the public court of opinion, but Oregon still has to follow statutes set by the law.

Actually..we dont know when it started only that it apparently started after Kyron went missing. Personally i would say it was BEFORE Kaine moved out though

JMO
 
  • #2,703
Any attorneys in the house?

Couldn't Kaine move back home and call LE to remove her since she's not allowed to be within X feet of him?
 
  • #2,704
If she asks for money for having taken care of Kyron all those years, I will lose my mind.

The truly sad thing is i could see her saying that too :(
 
  • #2,705
There is no proof Terri did anything, and her affair started after her husband left her. In this instance then, using your example here, it is a sound business decision to give someone your car for 10,000.

If she has been charged and out on bond, I could see the argument that she's got nerve asking for support. It isn't about what's appalling, it's about what is legal for a woman in the State of Oregon being thrown out of the family home to expect from the spouse doing the throwing.

We can be appalled in the public court of opinion, but Oregon still has to follow statutes set by the law.

I don't think I was saying that Oregon shouldn't follow statutes and I didn't say anything about her affair or her guilt.

It was simply an observation that it's not a real agreement if you don't agree to what was asked but set your own conditions for doing so.
 
  • #2,706
Well,now we're seeing the whole root of it all,aren't we?A missing child in a school,that didn't pan out,she never expected she'd be blamed.She can go live with her parents,she has no children with her and she can do what thousands of women do all the time,get a job.She tried to hire someone to kill him before a child went missing in her care,won't tell what has happened to him,having some kind of kinky thing with a guy she just met and now she wants money?Manipulate much?
 
  • #2,707
www.katu.com/news/local/98369319.html

"Kaine's attorney, Laura Rackner, said her client is not willing to hand over money to Terri. "He would like some cooperation from her first," she said. "He would like to know where his son is.""

Hopefully the judge sees it Kaine's way also but I doubt it. Criminals have more rights than victims in this country. YES, I know she is not a confirmed criminal yet...:furious:
 
  • #2,708
She's not contesting it as long as Kaine gives her money.

http://www.katu.com/news/local/98369319.html

(Grrrrrrrr....Must not fly to Portland and throttle Terri...)

Quite frankly, I would not want to live in that house.

I would cut my losses, give a quit claim deed and let her take over the payments, the insurance, taxes, electricity, etc.

I don't have anyway of knowing how much they owe on the house, but with the poor housing market, and the history of the house, she probably wouldn't be able to sell it.

She can find a job (ha ha)
 
  • #2,709
When I got divorced in NY, the property that was divided was only property acquired since we were married. It sounds like OR works someting like that.

I had to keep living with him for 2 more years until he finally signed a separation agreement. If I had left it would have been considered abandonment and I would have gotten nothing- including my children. Same thing if I'd been caught having an affair (I didn't have an affair) - adultery.

If my husband had owned the house before we were married, I wouldn't have been entitled to any part of it's worth.

As it was, I didn't start getting anything from him until we were divorced.

My sister left her husband for him cheating. She got support for herself and her kids, but not until after they were divorced.

It sounds like there might be evidence of hanky-panky with the landscape guy, so before he left her. Are they legally separated now? I don't think so.
I think the money she wants now is different than spousal support - Unless they're going to do a separation agreement next week or get a quicky divorce somehow.

jmo


.
 
  • #2,710
She wants him to provide her money so she won't be homeless?
She expects him to care about whatever condition she would be living in?
She thinks he has a responsibility to her?

After she tried to hire someone to put him six feet under?

I understand everything about the division of assets, but I would think that wanting him dead would imply she no longer needed anything from him.

And besides that, I would call it a travesty, more than a slap to the face (more like a shotgun blast) for him to ever have to provide for her again.

**Ques theme song and rotating hour glass**

These are the days of our lives...
 
  • #2,711
Many good people have to ''start over'' with much less than this gal. She's got post secondary education and her soon to be ex is providing care for her daughter. Many good people have found themselves 'homeless' and have been able to turn their lives around.
 
  • #2,712
For all we know they had a prenup. That would be my guess since he bought the house and put it solely in his name just a few months before they married. Here, in California, a 3 year marriage, she would not be entitled to spousal support. They could negotiate something for it, but she wouldn't be entitled to it.
 
  • #2,713
I know she did some sub teaching but anyone know when she quit teaching full time?
 
  • #2,714
That's a tough one. If their money is community property (and I do recognize the worth of parents who contribute to the family and finances by caring for the children at home) and she's being asked to leave the house, in a normal situation she'd be entitled to support... but my gosh this is a long way from a normal situation. I wonder what they'll do. I'm glad it's not my choice to decide.
 
  • #2,715
It isn't about what's appalling, it's about what is legal for a woman in the State of Oregon being thrown out of the family home to expect from the spouse doing the throwing.

From my perspective, KH hasn't thrown her out of the house. TMH put him and her child in danger; therefore, the court has prohibited her from going near KH and Baby K. In essence, the court is throwing her out for her own behavior.
 
  • #2,716
She wants him to provide her money so she won't be homeless?
She expects him to care about whatever condition she would be living in?
She thinks he has a responsibility to her?

After she tried to hire someone to put him six feet under?

I understand everything about the division of assets, but I would think that wanting him dead would imply she no longer needed anything from him.

And besides that, I would call it a travesty, more than a slap to the face (more like a shotgun blast) for him to ever have to provide for her again.

**Ques theme song and rotating hour glass**

These are the days of our lives...

BBM. On the contrary if she's on the list of his heirs and beneficiaries.
 
  • #2,717
Now I personally think anyone with a conscious would refrain from engaging in sexting with your soon to be ex husbands friend, as well as being more helfpul in the assistance of looking for your husbands missing child. Regardless if she did or didn't do anything to Kyron her actions are completely morally wrong and make her look BAD. Even if Kaine was having an affair, two wrongs don't make a right. She could have held her head high and done the right thing and come out the winner, but she has failed to do so. I'm tired of society making excuses for people that have no conscious and saying she's entitled to whatever the law allows. She isn't entitled to anything except what she deserves, and at this time I don't see her deserving much.

By the slight chance she didn't have anything to do with Kyron's disappearance she could have played her cards better and then been entitled to something. Maybe she could move in with her parents.
 
  • #2,718
He should still pay alimony/spousal support until she gets back on her feet. Of course, it probably differs from state to state.

My opinion only

Back on her feet? :waitasec:
 
  • #2,719
Removing the "allegations" of all the speculations, and just thinking based solely on the fact they are married, she is a stay-at-home mother, and now he wants her out of the home, I wouldn't go anywhere until this was resolved. Once you leave the house without something to protect her "rights" to the home, property within the house, money etc. a woman would be foolish not to have all the "ducks in order" before she moves out.
 
  • #2,720
she will never teach again. imo.

children, school, I mean.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
1,189
Total visitors
1,336

Forum statistics

Threads
632,444
Messages
18,626,616
Members
243,152
Latest member
almost_amber
Back
Top