Gnatcatcher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,999
- Reaction score
- 863
Thank you to everyone who posted throughout the broadcast, 7pm on a Sunday is my family time and I've given up way too much family time in these two years for this case, so I couldn't listen. I'll listen to the replay later.
I wanted to say a few things though. First of all, not only doesn't Brad believe the Zanny story, but George and Cindy never believed it either. If you can stand the lunacy, listen again to the FBI interviews from July 30, 2008 and Cindy clearly says that Zanny is code for whomever is watching the baby at that time. Could be Ricardo, could be Amy. Could NOT be Zanny. So Brad stating that, or laughing at it rather, doesn't take me by surprise.
I'm also not surprised he didn't bring up the $3K, for a few reasons. One, there's only so much time to talk and there were a ton of subjects touched on. Two, it's not in his best interest. Three, if people are listening who aren't as well versed in this case as we are, why bring up more muck.
I'm disappointed that he wasn't asked (or maybe he was and nobody posted it here? not sure), specifically how or who the Anthonys would get as a new attorney. Did Brad recommend anyone? Are they actively seeking counsel? What do they, take out an ad in the paper? How will that be handled.
And more specifically WHAT obstruction charges? I mean, I can write out a list myself, I'm sure we all could, but specifically on what could or will they be facing in the future?
I wanted to say a few things though. First of all, not only doesn't Brad believe the Zanny story, but George and Cindy never believed it either. If you can stand the lunacy, listen again to the FBI interviews from July 30, 2008 and Cindy clearly says that Zanny is code for whomever is watching the baby at that time. Could be Ricardo, could be Amy. Could NOT be Zanny. So Brad stating that, or laughing at it rather, doesn't take me by surprise.
I'm also not surprised he didn't bring up the $3K, for a few reasons. One, there's only so much time to talk and there were a ton of subjects touched on. Two, it's not in his best interest. Three, if people are listening who aren't as well versed in this case as we are, why bring up more muck.
I'm disappointed that he wasn't asked (or maybe he was and nobody posted it here? not sure), specifically how or who the Anthonys would get as a new attorney. Did Brad recommend anyone? Are they actively seeking counsel? What do they, take out an ad in the paper? How will that be handled.
And more specifically WHAT obstruction charges? I mean, I can write out a list myself, I'm sure we all could, but specifically on what could or will they be facing in the future?