Sorry guys - this looks like I wait until every one has gone to bed and then I slip in and argue with everyone. But - er - um - I am three hours behind most of you.
Just wanted to take a moment to explain my questioning. The real problem is the way I think and how I problem solve. So pretend my problem, (or a presentation or a sales pitch or whatever) is a tree. My whole "thing" is clarity, then a logical process, then I add the do dads to flush an idea out and make it look "pretty".
So if the SA's case against is a tree with bark and a gazillion leaves, what I would do is strip everything off, including the bark, and just have it there naked. Then the most important evidence would be the bark I would add. Then as needed, I would put the details such as this conversation(although I think there are more important ones) back on one by one until I was satisfied the finished product was balanced, but not overloaded by too much so - haha - you couldn't see the forest for the tree.
I should probably just go to bed and quit trying to explain. I just know for sure that a lot of the times a lot of detail is just too much and overwhelms the listener, so basically they absorb little or nothing. :nevermind:
:countsheep: