2011.03.07 Motions Hearing

[ecs5298]

LDB up!

 

[beach]

I am thinking Judge Perry spent the weekend researching case law. Seems just like his style. He knows what he is going to do, just trying to clarify one or two points.

 

[2goldfish]

Finally.

 

[TakeNote]

:skip: LDB is up :skip:.....its about Caylee!.....she was missing!

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

I wonder if His Honor will set some rules about the gum-chewing during the trial. When I served on a jury, no one was allowed to have food, gum, etc. in the Courtroom. I had to ask for permission to bring a bottled water with me because I have asthma and am prone to tickly coughing. I brought the small, unopened water bottle that was placed at my juror seat.

 

[Melanie]

OMG LOL!!!!!!!!!! good catch!!!

The same Joy Wray?

Joy went on to tell LE that a killer is stalking her, and she saw Roy Kronk coming out of the woods, but didn’t want him to see her so she “drove fast”.

That Joy Wray?

 

[pip]

Yea!! Done!

 

[AZlawyer]

Lawyers help me - is it just ok and acceptable for any attorney to stand up in court and make statements that he knows in fact to be false. I don't mean guilt or innocence of his client, but for example, alluding that ICA was handcuffed for WAY more than 4-5 minutes?

Is this type of "mis-truth" just par for the course, or can the judge put a stop to it?

I think there was conflicting testimony about the handcuffs, so CM is free to pick and choose which witnesses he wants to focus on in oral argument.

starts on page 3...check the index

Parks v. State , 644 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1994)

ETA I have looked online, but not found it yet. Although I have found links to several cases in which in was cited as an argument.

Here's the link:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11829987057721043399&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr

 

[Tulessa]

< Officially a CM survivor! :woohoo:

 

[sleutherontheside]

I love how the Judge checks with the court reporter. After that long diatribe he wanted to see if she needed a break.

 

[ziggy]

Now someone who can speak clearly and concisely!

 

[BigFatMommyDog]

...Fundamental disagreement as to facts

 

[eaglemom]

LDB - fundamental disagreement about facts in case (with defense)

 

[Eidetic]

HJBP: "Madame court reporter, how are you?"(after CM has nothing further and steps away)

LOL

 

[Melanie]

Finally - a proper lawyer! Bring it on

 

[TigerBalm]

Is this real life???????????

how I feel after listening to Mason..........


thankyoudavid
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N618fLxQP6w"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N618fLxQP6w[/ame]

 

[Intermezzo]

LDB asks if she may approach..Mason just walks right up to the Judge when describing an 10x10 room

 

[nachomama]

Correct me if I'm wrong but.. isn't it stated on the Universal tapes that she is there and talking of her own free will ???

 

[tlcya]

http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/briefs/2007/2001-2200/07-2111_rep.pdf

start at the below sentence...
page 14 but page 4 of the brief..Appellee has not met the burden to prove the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt....

that is another case where state v park is being cited in an apellate matter. Page 13 midway through discusses the state v park case (as it pertains to the apellate case in your link).

Has anyone located the actual Parks v. State case yet?

 

[okiedokietoo]

STATE: if all due respect to Counsel to start with we have fundamental disagreement with facts

Order of statements given by Miss Anthony, I have identified at least 26 where ICA giving statements to one or another