pip
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,332
- Reaction score
- 11
Nope.Could it have been during the "truth and Miss Anthony are strangers" hearing?

Nope.Could it have been during the "truth and Miss Anthony are strangers" hearing?
Yes, that fits with what has been said all along. I believe there is much discussion here...about dates...from when-to when...but IIRC the 3 days (2.6 to be more exact) accounted for the state (degree) of decomp. as well.Ok, jumped into the net to dig around and this was what I gathered.
Several years ago there was a trial in New York that involved issues about PM hair banding. The prosecutor's 2 witness's stated that PM banding is so similiar to environmental influences that it would be careless to assume there's a difference. BUT, the DT put their expert on the stand and this expert is the very one Baez retained and is refusing to consent to this expert in testifying.
So, the DT(New York case) puts their expert on the stand and he says that it isn't true that PM and environmental banding are similiar. He goes into detail of what the difference is AND....GET THIS....this expert informs the court that he has done enough research on PM banding that he can give a general timeline of when death occured. According to him PM banding starts around day 3 post death. So now would that mean that Caylee was left in the trunk for at least 3 days?
If I have time...I'll help you.Nope.That is the one where HHJS ordered the psych eval. There is another hearing where he reviewed it and ordered it sealed. Ugh, I wish I could find it.
Or illegally.ITA...suffering a loss (any loss) does not give a person license to behave badly.
You mean he can't ananlyze his own power point, right?Just listening to the closing. Good grief! Baez is still trying to sneak in those bench notes! This man can't even read his own power point! This man couldn't close an umbrella.
I found this...http://www.wesh.com/r/17039556/detail.htmlNope.That is the one where HHJS ordered the psych eval. There is another hearing where he reviewed it and ordered it sealed. Ugh, I wish I could find it.
Can you be more specific as to what he said? I don't want to listen!!Just listening to the closing. Good grief! Baez is still trying to sneak in those bench notes! This man can't even read his own power point! This man couldn't close an umbrella.
:floorlaugh:You mean he can't ananlyze his own power point, right?![]()
Oh that whole pp presentation was ridiculous. If you have something to say...just say it. If you can't remember your own argument, then have someone else close.You mean he can't ananlyze his own power point, right?![]()
Can you be more specific as to what he said? I don't want to listen!!
Sloppy work, in general. This greenhorn newbie has some nerve patting himself on the back for being able to say Succinylcholine after telling a judge of 30+ years experience that he probably isn't grasping the science. What an [unusual person].:floorlaugh:
Ananlyze!: sufficient of the sufficient methodologies....he has a power point and he is still all over the place, like a pingpong ball. :floorlaugh:
Ya know, when he first started I was wow...he prepared...then the longer he went on the less he made sense...and I totally stopped listening. It was like he couldn't even remember where he was going with his arguments.:floorlaugh:
Ananlyze!: sufficient of the sufficient methodologies....he has a power point and he is still all over the place, like a pingpong ball. :floorlaugh:
Sloppy work, in general. This greenhorn newbie has some nerve patting himself on the back for being able to say Succinylcholine after telling a judge of 30+ tears experience that he probably isn't grasping the science. What an [unusual person].
I think it was at a bond hearing, but I may be wrong. I just remember Judge sealing it after making a brief comment and a raised eyebrow look.Ya know PIP...I really did think that happened at the bond hearing...am I confused now?
Ya know, when he first started I was wow...he prepared...then the longer he went on the less he made sense...and I totally stopped listening. It was like he couldn't even remember where he was going with his arguments.
Over the top. The jury would have been snoring.Oh that whole pp presentation was ridiculous. If you have something to say...just say it. If you can't remember your own argument, then have someone else close.
I was so confused by this...then after reading here I realized that there must be something attached to the hair-banding motion that I didn't see? Is that the case...the State tried to get something on record?