2011.04.08 Frye Hearing Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
court reporters are amazing. I always wonder how they can possibly keep up.
 
imhoo DS is not proving that the hair science is junk science...

she is just making no sense
 
Based on DCS's arguments regarding the constraints of science, all the psychiatrists reports they have stating ICA has PTSD should be tossed. :)
 
JA shaking his head...Lowe is an expert through experience...she's claiming Lowe didn't get a 'blind' opinion from somone else...but IIRC, she did...how does defense get away with twisting facts...

Do you know any cases dealing with Frye dealing with error rates..NO...
 
Now I know what's been bothering me about DS. Her voice does not have the passion that you hear in so many attorneys.:waitasec:
 
Did she say,
"Baez cannot be willed away." Dang, maybe that is why my willing has not worked.
 
I may be wrong, but, I don't think DS understand what a Frye hearing means...
 
now saying there is a paucity in the research

saying it is meaningless and not probative


((big words don't make it so DS))
 
At least Sims doesn't need an assistant to turn the page on her PPP, unlike Baez. :)
 
Now DS is going after the term "consistent with". Apparently this is a highly prejudicial term.
 
LDB looks more refreshed today, now it's JA that looks a bit sleep deprived, short-fused.
 
O/T for this thread but the other one is closed...TurnaDot, I admire anyone who can speak (and type) two languages! English is very irregular and hard to learn. :)
You got that right.

Know, no
four, for
is a form of are, singular. are for plural. there are four people. there is one person. there is a table, but there are many chairs.
i know you want to, but i still say no to that idea.

Simple frustrating examples, but I could go on and on...

Geesh.

I'll stop now, but learning to write English is a biatch!
 
close up on cindy..

she is literally doing something so strange with her glassses! almost eating them!
 
Does anyone else think this sounds suspiciously like a college lecture on the topic??? She's moving at a lecture pace.....NOT an arguments pace. It is too vague. She is peppering the "speech" with tidbits...but relying on NON-Relevant info.
 
DCS: "now why does this matter"


I admit, I keep asking myself this every 20 secs or so (re: to her argument that is) ;)
 
DSimms: the forensic science has not gotten the meaning of consistant with "meaning" reference to that pages highlighted give to the court. Reading from a page of paper...non numerical statement given without imperical support...now there is a virgina article...if I may...I had highlighted...in this particular situation in 2009 what they did was they looked at 137 cases...

JA: not relevant to the standards of admisson...

DSimms: at least proffer why I think this argument...this is a case where they were clearly not guilty the authors wanted to go back and say why were they convicted when they were innocent. 60% of the evidence called by the state had not data...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
197
Guests online
461
Total visitors
658

Forum statistics

Threads
627,117
Messages
18,539,043
Members
241,193
Latest member
karmic14U
Back
Top