Just because the defense constantly threatens an appeal does not mean it will be granted. IMO, HHJP has done very well up to now ensuring there will be nothing to appeal. So my advice is to take it for the hot air it is.
CM: twenty two years...
JA: your honor...
HH: one lawyer at a time, not more than one lawyer making an argument. I am familar with that case, part of the innocence project...and that was a case of miss identifying the person.
DSimms: not just frye but the training of the individual, her employer the FBI, ...if another state adopts this methodology does not mean we should...
HH: okay. move to next motion. I thought you were doing rebuttal comments? What's next?
Baez is up - get ready folks. Your Honour is already very "sad" (I can't think of another word). Whatever arguments you tend to make, I know what's relevant, and what's not relevant. All I really want to hear is your arguments -- please proceed.
Judge: Please keep your comments confined to arguments. Contempt sanctions already mentioned (after JB said 1 sentence).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.