- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,076
- Reaction score
- 102,189
The all of the rulings made by HHJP have to do with evidence that has been out there for over two years. Yet from that time, JB has claimed his client is innocent, and calls this stuff junk science, yet tries to get it thrown out. It's such circular reasoning! IF ICA were truly innocent, and there were an explanation, there would be and explanation DESPITE of and FOR the evidence. It's all so ridiculous that noone ever calls JB out on that.