2011.05.11 Issues With Jane Valez-Mitchell

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brad's new theory is...Jose is going to tell the jury KC couldn't tell anyone about Caylee because of the severe emotional trauma, abuse, etc., etc., she suffered at the hands of her family...and she was afraid of them

And then the prosecution is going to replay the jail videos to show exactly HOW afraid KC appeared to be of CA and GA!
 
JVM going on about how the story is gonna throw the whole prosecution story out the window.

what a croc. her reaction and assertion about how this theory is gonna influence the case borders on being comical, if not downright stupid.

and they pay her a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
 
JANE is trying to say that this theory will WORK. She says it 'explains' everything. Oh jeez...

Jane says, it is a brilliant defense strategy, it explains the partying because
" that is how an unbalanced girl would react to a tragic accident.."


Oh, give me a break. Isnt JVM always ranting about the violent 'war' against women? What about the war against children by their own parents?
 
oh phooey
She's a frickin sociopath - all of you have said it already - nonsense.
 
I am sure the prosecution already knows how to defuse this. And I am sure they know this might happen. They are always one step ahead of the DT. No Jane it is not a brilliant idea. To many actions of KC are in the way of this even having a slight chance of working. .nope won"t work. Try again Jose.
 
Brad has conveniently 'forgotten' the internet searches, the duct tape, and the partying behavior. I believe the state is well-prepared for that.

SOTS saw Brad and Jose seeming to text on their cell phones during the jury hearing. Brad is working with the DT, IMO.

Even while representing the Anthonys, Brad seemed to "forget" a lot of details and didn't seem well versed on the FACTS in the case...remember his Larry King appearance???
 
It does explain why GA/CA aren't at jury selection. It's still stupid but it does explain it - not the $200 bucks CA just put in her account - hmmm no.

I've changed my mind. Doesn't explain diddley - most especially what she did to Caylee.
 
JANE is trying to say that this theory will WORK. She says it 'explains' everything. Oh jeez...

Jane says, it is a brilliant defense strategy, it explains the partying because
" that is how an unbalanced girl would react to a tragic accident.."

?

They expect us to buy that it was an accident.?!?!

Caylee Accidentally climbed into the trunk, and fell in to duct tape, which them wrapped around her head. Yep, happens every day....:banghead:
 
I would have been afraid of my parents too if I had been stealing their money, not telling them that I wasn't going to graduate high school, living under their roof and lying about having a job, letting them take care of my baby girl.....etc ad infinitum! My parents wouldn't have let me get away with 1% of the CARP that ICA did!
 
Accident would have been a believable explanation even with her saying that the duck tape was to stage a kidnapping. and her behavior was to escape reality. But the internet searches throws all that away. I really think she wanted to kill her mom and after the fight around fathers day killed Caylee to teach her mom a lesson. Also since she was not living at home she could use CA as a babysitter
 
I anticipate, if they float this idea of abuse, it will involve George accidentally killing Caylee, then KC being told to go, shut up, and act normal-- they'd take care of it. She was much too scared to risk running into either of them. jmo
 
Ok...Did I miss something. I followed from the beginning and I'm almost done reading Dianne Fanning's book to get refreshed on everything before the trial starts (not all fact, I know) but did ICA admit to killing her and the excuse is that it was an accident and she couldn't tell anyone because she was abused?
 
If there is any fear in the Anthony family it is that George, Cindy, and the brother and his girlfriend are all afraid of Casey. And, I think for good reason. My opinion.
 
JVM going on about how the story is gonna throw the whole prosecution story out the window.

what a croc. her reaction and assertion about how this theory is gonna influence the case borders on being comical, if not downright stupid.

and they pay her a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

A croc, indeed!! I am quite certain the prosecution is prepared for this "accident" defense. I'm sure they already expect the DT to pull that.
 
I anticipate, if they float this idea of abuse, it will involve George accidentally killing Caylee, then KC being was told to go, shut up, and act normal-- they'd take care of it. She was much to scared to risk running into either of them. jmo
and GA snuck over to TL's one night and put Caylee's body in the trunk of her car. Then ICA drove around all those days wondering what "that smell" was.

I just can't believe that BC would even think something this easily disproved will be used.
 
Ok...Did I miss something. I followed from the beginning and I'm almost done reading Dianne Fanning's book to get refreshed on everything before the trial starts (not all fact, I know) but did ICA admit to killing her and the excuse is that it was an accident and she couldn't tell anyone because she was abused?

NO. Read here more true facts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
213
Guests online
584
Total visitors
797

Forum statistics

Threads
625,826
Messages
18,511,127
Members
240,850
Latest member
SeacowNW
Back
Top