2011.05.12 Jury Selection Day FOUR (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I find it difficult to follow AF. Her thought processes switch in the middle. Even Jose is easier to follow. I love HHJP. I can almost get everything he says. :blowkiss:
 
I'm in and out all day and unable to follow very closely but is this the 2nd juror now or or they moving faster than this morning?
Thank you

This is the second juror. :)
 
KC was neither a good student nor a good employee.
 
haha he doesn't think a good student or good employee is a mitigating factor. NICE WORK.

Love this juror.
 
Death Penalty is not an automatic sentence just because it's a DP case.
(to remind for us non legals)
 
I guess ICA must have brain development issues. O
 
:floorlaugh: "That's kinda pushing it" the potential juror says when asked if he thinks being a good employee and a good student would be mitgating factors!!
 
i thought she could get this specific (like are they trying to get their strategy on the penalty phase with these questions)
 
Wonder how the SA and the DT look at an atheist in a case like this.
 
Did she just mention sexual abuse? :eek:

Look out Georgeeeeeeeeee!
 
It seems from the defense's questioning that they are going to throw everything at the wall in regards to ICA and see if anything sticks or sways the jury. Trial ending date

June, 2013
 
Sounds like DT already knows she'll be convicted and is ensuring they can get people to just give her LIPWOP. Wow!!

dysfunctional family?? LOL!!! ummm.......duh!!!
 
So, according to these questions, mitigating factors will be "our client was an abused peabrain."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
583
Total visitors
721

Forum statistics

Threads
625,651
Messages
18,507,559
Members
240,827
Latest member
The Flamazing Finder
Back
Top