Just thinking that the DT is planning to use all 10 of their strikes when they reach the 12 mark, just to delay this further. At that point they will have to re-interview at least 10 more potentials. :maddening:
I'm a little surprised that she was not objected to (by either side) based on her answer about solving the 'mystery'. It is NOT the jury's duty to solve the mystery, but to base their decision on whether or not she's guilty based only on the evidence provided.
Let's move the discussion about "alleged" abuse out of the Jury Thread. I am sure we have a thread on this for extensive discussion. When I get a moment, I'll bump it up.
Just thinking that the DT is planning to use all 10 of their strikes when they reach the 12 mark, just to delay this further. At that point they will have to re-interview at least 10 more potentials. :maddening:
I doubt it. They'd have no choice but to accept the next 10 which would limit their ability to choose wisely if they did that.Just thinking that the DT is planning to use all 10 of their strikes when they reach the 12 mark, just to delay this further. At that point they will have to re-interview at least 10 more potentials. :maddening:
Next up should be juror 1011 - male - no hardship, diabetic, retired, single.
Holy carp! My dog went nutso and I looked out the window to find our horse walking down the street! LOL! Horsie safe, crisis averted.
okay fellas off to my tattoo removal that hurts, but hurts less that the DT! post well and often for me! :biglaugh:
okay fellas off to my tattoo removal that hurts, but hurts less that the DT! post well and often for me! :biglaugh:
so one could say that was a possitive alert...not a false positive....