2011.05.14 - Jury Selection DAY SIX (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Way too many off topic conversations going on. Let's get back on topic of the juror selections etc.

I apologize Miss Patty G. I will try to control my frustration level without commenting on what I am going to do about it.
 
Here is my problem with this line of questioning that I think the SA was objecting to is that JB is giving a 'lecture' type thing before asking the actual question. This is what is taking so long.

I personally believe the SA will be using their first strike on this PJ though.
 
He wanted the drunk that hit his car stopped by the police. He likes the security guards at work. He seems to believe in the laws of our society. He personally sounds very responsible and hard working. He's young, but I think he's bright and honest. I think I want him on the jury.
 
Hmm... No way she is going to testify. Basing that opinion on JB's questioning.
 
I think George was irritated that Baez was giving the PJ a primer on reasonable doubt and what the judge will instruct him on...looks like the judge let Baez go on...
 
State does not want him, due to his tweets. Victim of a crime.

CJBP says that is a stretch.
 
What's that big old book Baez has?

Jury Selection for <Unusual Persons>?
 
Just as I predicted the SA is using a strike.
 
Oh please! That's a terrible reason to strike...and I personally would not know that that would be a victim of a crime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
531
Total visitors
636

Forum statistics

Threads
625,960
Messages
18,516,472
Members
240,907
Latest member
kaz33
Back
Top