JB: LDB asked the questions I am going to ask. do you want to be a juror on this case?
yes
JB: why
an opportunity to serve and interesting.
JB: ever been on a jury? (we asked that three times today by my count)
no
JB: did you see the helicopters? how do you think the media affects a case?
they can sway the public opinion but if the jurors don't have contact...it does not influence me.
JB: (I say they are STALLING)IMHO.
JB: has a person been paid for their testimony, if a person is payed for their story(like YOUR experts Jose?) would you consider that as a motive for their testimony?
YES.
JB: presumtion of innocent: reasonable doubt for example the charges, there are multiple charges the state as ELECTED to charge miss anthony with. I am throwing this out as an example, if there are three elements to a charge each one must be proven to the exclusion of reasonable doubt. If one is not proven but not all three, you must see she is innocent, can you do that?
yes
JB: there are defenses if you don't find for the top charge then you can find for the lesser. the fact that you are given multiple...you must apply the same burden to the beyond a reasonable....basicaly that means the process stays the same even tho there are the same options...
AQGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
JB: I apologize for asking questions that seem obvious. the instructions are easy to listen to them in the abstract...this is the last time I can speak to you...but what the judge instructs you is the final word. (laugh) he will have printed instructions for you.
JB: I may have asked you this before: if there are a hundred options the burden remains the same and you are not incouraged to vote, settle comprimise and find miss anthony guilty, can you follow that?
yes.
JB: miss Finnell touched on the penalty phase...and there may never ever be a penalty phase( I call STALLING, he is STALLING) Miss A does not have to take the stand and that is her right and there are, as in his instructions earlier this week, this is, these are rights that are dear to all of us and a person does not have to...this is a more difficult one for jurors to understand because ....there is no defense burden so there is not side that has to be told by the defense. As difficult as that, because in normal everyday life we don't process that way. Can you hold the state to burden and expect NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING from the DEFENSE?
yes