HHJP: alright the juror in 3308 and is a even numbered juror. he is going to change his flight plans, if you are going to bump him. you have no pre-emptory? (sp?) all all eleven back there?
MG: it is my understanding that he could change his flight plans, it wasn't an issue he just hadn't done it yet.
HHJP: all I am saying is that if you are going to exercise pre emptory...
MG: judge, we simply don't know yet. let's bring in that other juror and put him in back with the 11. as soon as he gets here, let me know.
yes, your honor.
JB: we would like to exercise a pre emptory at this time. Everyones here? lets bring in 3038. folks we got 12, as soon as we take care of this
I AM SWEARING THEM IN!!!!!:rollercoaster::yourock::skip::Banane59: raying: :bow::scale:
DT jumps up and asks to exercise pre-empory at this time?
HHBP says bring 3038 in . . .
PJ sounds like she was crying . . . went to work she didn't realize her employer wouldn't pay her.
HHBP asking questions about why she didn't say anything . . . asks who is her employer . . . she is not at her 90 days . . . financial hardship on her? PJ said YES!
HHJP: we have 12 jurors. we will bring them in to be sworn. does the defense have any backstrike?
JB: seat 22.
LDB: the state objects. she is a female. the strike is gender based.
JB: mr. baez you stipulate a female. it is my understanding a female is no longer a protected (?)
LDB: I have case law.
HHJP: let me see it.
LDB: I am unaware of this being overturned.
JB: yes I recognize she is a female. would the court like a gender neutral reason? this juror mentioned she has a juror who has a granddaughter who is two and she said she could not recommend the dp.