As poorly as this defense is coming off, I am at a loss as to what they could have done/been doing instead (not counting the unpreparedness, etc...just the actual defense.) If your client won't admit to anything other than an accident in which she basically had no part, and certainly won't go for insanity, they were not left many options. They can only present what their client agrees to, basically and have to try to take advantage of any little moment of drama to detract from the other side, who actually have a case.
I understand why they are emphasizing the lying, it can't be ignored, certainly so they have to at least try to make a point that she does not know lies from truth about anything and lived in her own little world of deceit. It is not helping their case, but then again, what would?
They literally have nothing to work with. This is the most open and shut circumstantial case I have ever seen...and all thanks to their client.
I agree. They don't have anything to work with. But JB and Company could still go with this defense but at least still do it with class.
They can still attack each witness, but do it with class and with issues that are relevant to this case. IMO they aren't. Even if they wanted to go with the "molestation" defense there's still a better way of going about how they are dealing with all the other witnesses.