- Joined
- Oct 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,371
- Reaction score
- 3,695
I thought in their OS the DT said baby Caylee died on the 16th in a drowning????
At close of evidence, we are entitled to present an argument for aquittal.
If the evidence is insufficent to warrant a conviction, then the court must step in and aquit.
(They are asking for an aquittal from Perry)
I wonder if this ever works? IF this is standard stuff has the judge ever said "you're right" Dismissed!
The DT can rest their case without presenting a case?
Far more cases end with a whimper than a bang. Have faith. There is always the things that need to be presented after the DT team is done....providing that the judge doesn't feel that she is innocent and grant this motion and just send her home with her proud parents today.
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
I wonder if this ever works? IF this is standard stuff has the judge ever said "you're right" Dismissed!
Um...how can CM say "there's no evidence to prove when she died, how she died, and who was present when she died" when the DT itself claims to know all of these things? :banghead: