From these definitions, from what I know about this case, it sounds like involuntary manslaughter. Unless evidence comes out later that he told people that sometimes he wanted to kill her or had tried to kill her previously.
Whaddayaknow,
SEAJAY I read the same post and it sounds like:
Second-degree murder: any intentional murder with malice aforethought, but is not premeditated or planned.[13] and/or:
If that same bar fight stemmed from a
discovery of infidelity, however, it may be mitigated to voluntary manslaughter.[14] What if prosecution substituted the words "discovery of infidelity" to
"disclosure of divorce action"?
1) If that beautiful Mother was hit with an object, I just don't see how it can be anything other than voluntary manslaughter.
to me 2) And dragging her out to the balcony, kind of looks like trying to cover up a crime,
to me. 3) And,
conveniently coming to his senses when 2 large men broke into the room?.... (I'll just keep my opinion to myself on that one)
4) Sitting on the rail (as if to jump)... seems like feigned drama,
to me
5) Screaming in front of child(ren) who became so scared they ran for help. Seems pretty callous behavior,
to me
(Get to the point IQ!) My point is, I see 5 MAJOR DECISIONS this man made.....
he had the ability to make or NOT MAKE all these decisions.
When you look at the totality of events....walking into the room screaming, scaring off child(ren), fellow passengers calling for help (above and on the same floors), male family members trying to break down doors, a woman screaming for her life, cruise security & medical rushing to help, blood all over the place, a severely injured woman being dragged to the balcony....
I have to ask myself, will the
prosecution be asking for justice and the
defense promoting justification for his actions? It seems that the public as well as members of our forum are divided on the same question...
.Justice or justification?