sfbaynancydrew
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,323
- Reaction score
- 233
Sorry to quote myself (hehe) but I keep coming back to this this afternoon. She left a note for the opening barista. Unless this was very well planned out I don't believe it was staged. I am trying to walk myself through her last hour (minutes?) at the stand. She closed up the windows (8:00 pm closing time), made two cups of coffee (could have been done earlier but I would think they would get cold), wrote a note to opener, got call from boyfriend stating he would be late (IIRC, this was stated to be the reason he spoke to her, can't find a source now so purely me), then was abducted. These things had to have happened very close together since LE states she was abducted at roughly 8:00 pm. I would think they would have stated 8:30, or even 8:15 if it was closer to either of those times.
I just can't wrap my brain around why she let someone in the stand. The only alternative I can think of is she left to take out the trash, and was abducted at that point? My brain hurts![]()
I just can't wrap my brain around why she let someone in the stand. The only alternative I can think of is she left to take out the trash, and was abducted at that point? My brain hurts![]()
I definitely hear "them" instead of her as well.
It's hard to say- You can imagine at that point he had likely had no sleep, and was a complete "mess."But it sure seems...strange.. especially when paired with all the other random things he has said on camera.
Southern comfort, I took the mess just as you did.
Found this picture of Sam from what I believe is her drivers license. Couldn't seem to find a bigger one, but I wanted to share it because she looks SO different in it.
She really is a very beautiful girl. This picture reminds me of Kate Winslet.
I've been thinking the same thing.. First I thought maybe the note was part of the staging, to make it look more real, but it just doesn't sit well for some reason.
I think maybe someone was waiting for her outside to take out the trash (maybe hiding on the other side of the hut, out of camera view) and then followed her back in before the door closed. I think the guy HAD to be inside the hut at some point, since the owners report both that the camera had been obstructed (which we can only assume was the inside camera) and that the (outside) camera had picked up a truck with a person in it sitting 50 feet away.
OR I guess the outside camera could have recorded the truck, but been obstructed after they came outside, before they walked away?
My brain hurts too![]()
I agree with Southern on this too...I think he meant the situation, not the hut.
I'm starting to really believe that we are missing a huge puzzle piece here regarding what was going on when Sam was taken. Her boyfriend had spoken to her minutes before, and didn't call the cops that night at all. LE won't release the video, yet they don't seem to know who the guy on it is.
Maybe some "business" was going on at the coffee shop, maybe the bf knew about it, and didn't want Sam, or himself to get in trouble for it. Maybe her bf even knows who took her. Even if he told James or LE, maybe they can't find this guy, and don't want the publics help finding him because they're afraid of what might happen to Sam if they scare the perp.
I don't know, just my opinion. I really hope more is going on behind the scenes, so to speak, because it is not looking good with what we know.
The thing that bothers me is the surveillance inside the hut. The perp seems to have known about it if he obscured it, but then why come in at all? I can see the "business" inside the hut angle without a doubt, especially if you know they don't look at the video unless they have reason, but if you were gonna take her, why come in - why not grab her as she came out? Unless you knew she wasn't coming out until her bf showed up?
I think the APD owes us a bottle of Excedrin, because we wouldn't be hurting ourselves if we knew whether her stuff was left or taken, did the perp knock or just walk in, in what way was the video obscured, etc.....UGH.
That, combined with the new info that she (supposedly) stole $3000 from her dad, makes me think it might have been someone she was expecting.. a meeting set up to give whoever back the $$ but then things went bad. Either because it wasn't enough, or the guy just decided to have some fun with her.. who knows.
http://dps.alaska.gov/AST/ABI/docs/SDEUreports/2011%20Annual%20Drug%20Report.pdf
This is the State Trooper Annual Drug Report for 2011, just released today. It gives you some insight as to the scope of the drug/alcohol problems up here.
There have been far too many rumors posted already in this case, and it's going to stop right now. If you can link it to MSM, you can post it. If not, forget it.
:tos:
It's all right, ryanemsmom. I wasn't targeting your post specifically. The rumors had gotten out of hand long before you posted, even after numerous warnings. We have to get back on track here.Thank you Bessie. I didn't know if that website was considered MSM or not, I couldn't find a reference anywhere and it (the link) didn't show up as stars so I thought it was ok.
There have been far too many rumors posted already in this case, and it's going to stop right now. If you can link it to MSM, you can post it. If not, forget it.
:tos:
IMO, she had her phone on her, in her pocket, when she was taken. If it was in her purse, or left with her belongings, I would think the first thing the opening barista would've done is pick up the phone, find the contact # for her dad or Duane and call them and ask why her stuff was here and to make sure everything was ok. If a purse was left behind, you know they opened it to look for a phone.
I think in either scenerio, whether she was taken, or left with someone she knew, she had the phone until the abductor made her hand it over and then got rid of it. (Or IF she left on her own, she got rid of it herself so she couldn't be tracked.)
I don't know any teenager who doesn't have their phone in their pocket at all times..