I hear ya.
IMO the bottom line here is that LE has said that by all indications so far, they suspect that this is a random abduction. We have two POIs that we need to be sleuthing the heck out of. LE has clearly said there is no relation to the family that they know of. Here at WS we are supposed to proceed in a direction that is in accordance with the information and direction that we get from LE.
Again, let’s look at our stats, the rarity of this crime. Her age, and imo most importantly, the fact that there could be other persons involved.
What does this tell us, “other persons involved”. This to me indicates some sort of “conspiracy”.
Let’s talk about motives here. What on earth motive do we have for a potential conspiracy of individuals to abduct a random three year old child. Also what type of “capabilities” would such persons possess? Well, with the POIs at the moment, we’ve got clear evidence of exploitation (CP) and violence (DV). Not to mention kidnapping.
Again, of course family is 101 in any investigation.
But what is LE telling us?
Often the involvement of “other individuals” involves “Felony Accessory After the Fact”. But I get the impression (and I could be wrong) that this reference to others is not in relation to that charge.