Alec Baldwin fired prop gun, killing 1 on movie set, Oct 2021 #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
IIRC, this tragedy occured during a walk-through/blocking.

Protocol -- inoperative blue gun AFAIK:

1666317399717.png

image from inertproducts.com

So -- why did the armorer bring a working firearm? Why did the AD pass the working firearm to the actor? Why did the actor point the working firearm directly at a human?

And, why oh why was there live ammo on the set???

Wonder if we'll ever have answers....

jmho ymmv lrr
 
IIRC, this tragedy occured during a walk-through/blocking.

Protocol -- inoperative blue gun AFAIK:

View attachment 374540
image from inertproducts.com

So -- why did the armorer bring a working firearm? Why did the AD pass the working firearm to the actor? Why did the actor point the working firearm directly at a human?

And, why oh why was there live ammo on the set???

Wonder if we'll ever have answers....

jmho ymmv lrr

I believe it's been stated that the armourer was not notified of the walk rehearsal and was not present for the event and the firearm was handed to Baldwin by the assistant director, who declared it cold.

 
IIRC, this tragedy occured during a walk-through/blocking.

Protocol -- inoperative blue gun AFAIK:

View attachment 374540
image from inertproducts.com

So -- why did the armorer bring a working firearm? Why did the AD pass the working firearm to the actor? Why did the actor point the working firearm directly at a human?

And, why oh why was there live ammo on the set???

Wonder if we'll ever have answers....

jmho ymmv lrr
Where the live ammo came from, and how it got loaded into the gun are the biggest questions that I have personally. But I don't think we are going to get satisfactory answers to either of those questions.
 
"WHERE is the Rust justice?

Exactly one year after Alec Baldwin fatally shot Halyna Hutchins, there are STILL no charges - or even a sheriff's report - as filming is set to resume..."

 
Out of curiosity does anyone know if Alec Baldwin ever took a basic gun safety class? I would think a producer making a movie with firearms would want all his actors to have a basic idea of what gun safety was about.

IIRC, in an early linked article AB bragged about his 'acting chops' including ability to ride a horse, a motorcycle, and handle guns.

I also recall a text/email exchange between The Armorer HG & the Producer to whom she reported, stating that AB had not shown up for required firearms review with her (HG) three separate times.

Yet she delivered a working firearm to a set for AB, for blocking/walk-thru, when protocol calls for an inoperative blue gun.

Delivered a non-protocol working revolver, non-protocol loaded, to a set the called for the inoperative blue gun, to an actor who had not met safety protocols.

Now would I, at that age, have had the backbone to deliver only the inoperative blue gun that the scene called for?

Or -- even more backbone -- "Mr. Baldwin (producer, part of the reason I have this very job & this very paycheck,) once you complete the industry-required firearms safety review, I"ll be happy to deliver operating firearms to sets where those are appropriate."

Accompanied by the Assistant Director, this should have been effective.

But AFAIK this didn't happen.

So the on-staff Armorer brought the non-protocol loaded, operating firearm not needed for that scene to the AD, and that AD handed over the loaded, working firearm & Alec Baldwin pointed that loaded working firearm directly at Halyna Hutchins & her death is the result.

That's way too many mistakes imho.

jmho ymmv lrr
 
Out of curiosity does anyone know if Alec Baldwin ever took a basic gun safety class? I would think a producer making a movie with firearms would want all his actors to have a basic idea of what gun safety was about.
A film industry worker that I spoke to (camera operator) implied that actors are not required to take fire arms safety classes.

He did, however, state very strongly that all actors, directors etc are expected to follow fire arms protocols:

- Nobody other than the armorer issues a weapon to anybody. Nobody besides the armorer makes any kind of declaration about it.

- The armorer checks the weapon upon issuing it. The receiving actor then re-checks the weapon. If the receiving actor is not familiar with weapons, or is personally opposed to handling them more than absolutely necessary, they are assigned a "shooting partner". The actor's shooting partner then re checks the weapon for the actor.

He also stated that well run sets take the protocols to the extent that rubber guns are still weapons, are issued by the armorer, checked and rechecked.
 
I keep trying to understand why it was so important to have the one person responsible for set firearms unavailable at that particular time.
 
My husband is working on a set right now with firearms. He said everyone is VERY cautious, much more than he has previously noted. He keeps hearing, "does anyone else want to check the firearm? Anyone?" I sincerely hope that this tragedy does make a difference in the industry!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
512
Total visitors
680

Forum statistics

Threads
625,604
Messages
18,506,877
Members
240,821
Latest member
MMurphy
Back
Top