CarolinaMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 5,173
- Reaction score
- 126
As I recall, Judge Perry maintained Judge Strickland's original ruling with these exceptions:
Perry's 1st order: Deadline of August 25, defense could take notes, special magistrate
Perry's 2nd order: Location of the examination of the documents, added State's Attorneys to the review process prior to bringing documents to the judge.
He never changed the deadline. Whatever his last order was, the defense had the right to view the documents from the time of his first order. The defense would have had 8 work days to view the documents in a neutral place after the meeting in the judge's chambers.
My bet is that the defense didn't meet the deadline and the judge had made himself perfectly clear in his meeting with all the attorneys.
I keep telling myself that patience is a virtue... it's not working!
Perry's 1st order: Deadline of August 25, defense could take notes, special magistrate
Perry's 2nd order: Location of the examination of the documents, added State's Attorneys to the review process prior to bringing documents to the judge.
He never changed the deadline. Whatever his last order was, the defense had the right to view the documents from the time of his first order. The defense would have had 8 work days to view the documents in a neutral place after the meeting in the judge's chambers.
My bet is that the defense didn't meet the deadline and the judge had made himself perfectly clear in his meeting with all the attorneys.
I keep telling myself that patience is a virtue... it's not working!