Gnatcatcher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,999
- Reaction score
- 863
Did he give you his name? (and is she allowed to post that name here?)
Did he give you his name? (and is she allowed to post that name here?)
Hello EU :wave:!
Per letter D, in the order, the defense cane proceed without judicial approval based on the answers given on the phone:
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...cuments in Possession of Texas Equusearch.pdf
I did tell him that I am familar with the place now after the fact. That just a few feet in from the treeline the place becomes like a bowl and it would hold water. It was just after Fay.
When he was leaving, I said that I never even expected a call to begin with. With kind of a smirk he said well they only gave us 32 names and yours was not on it. You were on Suburban Drive, they were supposed to give us the names of ANYONE on Suburban. We found 150 more people. Acting like TES is/was up to something. Well, I didn't have anything help him. Just because there was not water on the road does not do them any good. The road is not a bowl like the area where Caylee was found.
Hello EU :wave:!
Per letter D, in the order, the defense cane proceed without judicial approval based on the answers given on the phone:
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...cuments in Possession of Texas Equusearch.pdf
fla mom, was he writing down your answers or tape recording, if you can say?
He did keep asking about water in the area. He kept asking if I saw water on Suburban Drive. Now my answer is no to did I see water ON Suburban Drive the road. No, standing water to run a car through. He kept asking a few ways the same question. Finally I had to say. This is what I saw and can say is the truth to what I saw. No water on the actual road. I could NOT see into the woods and tell if there was water or not. I can't even say I looked over there more than to notice there were woods there. We were driving to our next search location.
I did tell him that I am familar with the place now after the fact. That just a few feet in from the treeline the place becomes like a bowl and it would hold water. It was just after Fay.
When he was leaving, I said that I never even expected a call to begin with. With kind of a smirk he said well they only gave us 32 names and yours was not on it. You were on Suburban Drive, they were supposed to give us the names of ANYONE on Suburban. We found 150 more people. Acting like TES is/was up to something. Well, I didn't have anything help him. Just because there was not water on the road does not do them any good. The road is not a bowl like the area where Caylee was found.
YUP, there it is alright...Thank You nums24
If questions 1-4 in part C are asked and the Defense deems further investigation or questioning is appropriate then the field report form is released to them and they can conduct further investigation as they deem appropriate
fla*mom
Did your point about no water ON Subruban dr, the road, as opposed to yes or no if water in the wooded area where the remains were found get across to the investigator?
I know he asked about water "on" Suburban Dr but IMO he was trying to trip up your answer to see if could benefit their theory.
I don't remember the Order but I don't think it said that TES had to give the names of every single searcher that went out to the Suburdan drive "area" to search.:waitasec:
Many, like yourself, searched the wooded area by the school but the 32 identified searched the area closer to where the remains were found
IMO the Defense has been given permission to cast a wider net in order for them to ensnare that someone who can give them the information that will benefit them and their theory.
:twocents:
Yes.![]()
^ I don't know if this helps but it was in a video of herself visiting the site, 6 minutes in she mentions the trail that leads to the Anthony home http://www.wftv.com/video/25098994/index.html.
I told him that we were not the first team to be in that area. The area had already been searched prior to us getting there.
I have no idea if our team leader wrote we were there or not. I didn't see any papers he filled out at all, one way or the other. The only paper I ever filled out to my recollection was the volunteer form at the staging area. I certainly never filled out any report on where we searched and what was found. I know that for sure.
It was about 45 minutes ago, there was a knock at the door and there was this older man standing there. I thought he was selling something. He asked if I was me. and I said yes. He then said he was a private investigator for the defense team of Casey Anthony. I let him in because i have nothing to hide and to tell the truth I was curious what he was going to say. He asked if I knew why he was there and I said yes, because of the answers I gave during the phone call.
I don't want to lose this so I will post it bits sorry
Didn't think I really would get follow up call let alone someone come to the door.
I wonder how long it will be before the defense demands to question anyone who has read anything on the case? They are fishing and will continue until they find the ONE person who will corroborate their theory. They have nothing and they are trying to manufacture something imofla*mom
Did your point about no water ON Subruban dr, the road, as opposed to yes or no if water in the wooded area where the remains were found get across to the investigator?
I know he asked about water "on" Suburban Dr but IMO he was trying to trip up your answer to see if could benefit their theory.
I don't remember the Order but I don't think it said that TES had to give the names of every single searcher that went out to the Suburdan drive "area" to search.:waitasec:
Many, like yourself, searched the wooded area by the school but the 32 identified searched the area closer to where the remains were found
IMO the Defense has been given permission to cast a wider net in order for them to ensnare that someone who can give them the information that will benefit them and their theory.
:twocents: