All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

[The World According]

Regarding the question can the Judge in Florida have jurisdiction to order a witness in another state to complete a depo I am not a lawyer, so my guess is there are only two possibilities and both are a win for the prosecutors
either yes, he does
or no he does not, however, that would mean she is NOT going to be able to testify for the defense. In either situation the jury will have the truth and only the truth regarding the exact area Caylee was found. You see how that works? This is a dud for the defense, already. Worse than not working for them, it adds suspicion to their efforts, imo. They seem to have a poor understanding of how frequently things boomerang on them. You just can't make this stuff up!!!

Even viewed in the light most favorable to the defense, let's say she does take the stand and maintain what she alleges. No worries, the state simply calls up each and every member of her team and the exchange goes largely like this one Kathi had with one of them:

WFTV found Texas EquuSearch documents that show Buchanan and her team were at Blanchard Park that day and even that they found bones there.

Volunteer Lela Radojevic, who was on Buchanan's team that day, says they were at Blanchard Park from morning until late afternoon.

"You were all together all day at Blanchard Park and nobody ever, with you, went to Suburban Drive that day?" WFTV reporter Kathi Belich asked Radojevic.

"No," she said.
Voila!

 

[Intermezzo]

"Just so all minds are clear, " Judge Perry said he will help them get any reluctant witnesses scheduled. You bet your life this depo will be rescheduled, just as sure as the sun comes up every morning!!!

I remember when he said that..
How was this Depo being conducted? Skype?
She already has a subpoena so what will happen to ensure she will not cancel the Depo when its re-scheduled?

 

[Gaia713]

Regarding the question can the Judge in Florida have jurisdiction to order a witness in another state to complete a depo I am not a lawyer, so my guess is there are only two possibilities and both are a win for the prosecutors
either yes, he does
or no he does not, however, that would mean she is NOT going to be able to testify for the defense. In either situation the jury will have the truth and only the truth regarding the exact area Caylee was found. You see how that works? This is a dud for the defense, already. Worse than not working for them, it adds suspicion to their efforts, imo. They seem to have a poor understanding of how frequently things boomerang on them. You just can't make this stuff up!!!

Even viewed in the light most favorable to the defense, let's say she does take the stand and maintain what she alleges. No worries, the state simply calls up each and every member of her team and the exchange goes largely like this one Kathi had with one of them:

WFTV found Texas EquuSearch documents that show Buchanan and her team were at Blanchard Park that day and even that they found bones there.

Volunteer Lela Radojevic, who was on Buchanan's team that day, says they were at Blanchard Park from morning until late afternoon.

"You were all together all day at Blanchard Park and nobody ever, with you, went to Suburban Drive that day?" WFTV reporter Kathi Belich asked Radojevic.

"No," she said.
Voila!

I do not think the judge has jurisdiction over her in her home state; however, if the crime (falsification of documents in a murder case) occured in Florida, he can charge her in Florida and extradite her back to Florida to be tried. So there IS jurisdiction in Florida because the event happened there.

 

[LambChop]

I do not think the judge has jurisdiction over her in her home state; however, if the crime (falsification of documents in a murder case) occured in Florida, he can charge her in Florida and extradite her back to Florida to be tried. So there IS jurisdiction in Florida because the event happened there.

But the FBI was involved when it was reported as a kidnapping. Not sure that would carry any weight but I bet that lawyer will be looking for her to make some sort of deal. Defense can't use her for a witness if she has outstanding charges against her in Florida. I would hope they would not let this one slide by without pursuing it. Too many people lying in this case and getting away with it. Put a stop to it now. jmo

 

[whiteangora]

But the FBI was involved when it was reported as a kidnapping. Not sure that would carry any weight but I bet that lawyer will be looking for her to make some sort of deal. Defense can't use her for a witness if she has outstanding charges against her in Florida. I would hope they would not let this one slide by without pursuing it. Too many people lying in this case and getting away with it. Put a stop to it now. jmo

Somebody is going to have to be held accountable at some point, it really is ridiculous when you think about the lies and deceit and other underhanded dealings that have been allowed to slide.

 

[SallyLu]

Somebody is going to have to be held accountable at some point, it really is ridiculous when you think about the lies and deceit and other underhanded dealings that have been allowed to slide.

I think that's going to happen soon. It was bound to happen at some point. This crowd have gotten away with their bs and crap for too long.

Happy Days!

 

[ThinkTank]

I'm curious to see if they are able to reshedule before the status hearing. I believe the state must depose her before 10/31/10. If she doesn't reschedule before the hearing, I wonder what HHJP will have to say.

I believe Laura's attorney will cooperate with rescheduling the deposition, being done via Skype because Laura lives in NJ, but Laura will plead the 5th, because she is currently being investigated for a felony, and anything she would say in the deposition, could be used against her if she gets prosecuted on the felony. The State has a right to take Laura's deposition, because she is on the Defense Witness List.

 

[ThinkTank]

Well...you'd think they would change their name...on Val's site it's the same....I will PM you the name they go by on JB'S website......if you want...yeah...I ran scans and got some alerts...shut me down for a while. I use CCleaner and also the reg edit feature, plus Norton and Malware Bytes...Paranoid much LOL ?

Yes, please PM the info to me. Thank you!

 

[whiteangora]

Well...you'd think they would change their name...on Val's site it's the same....I will PM you the name they go by on JB'S website......if you want...yeah...I ran scans and got some alerts...shut me down for a while. I use CCleaner and also the reg edit feature, plus Norton and Malware Bytes...Paranoid much LOL ?

JB? Who would that be?

 

[LambChop]

I believe Laura's attorney will cooperate with rescheduling the deposition, being done via Skype because Laura lives in NJ, but Laura will plead the 5th, because she is currently being investigated for a felony, and anything she would say in the deposition, could be used against her if she gets prosecuted on the felony. The State has a right to take Laura's deposition, because she is on the Defense Witness List.

Plus weren't there issues earlier on with Laura around the time that the JJ taping came up at one of the hearings and HHJP stated to reschedule and if it continued to be a problem with the one's from other states he would put the pressure on to assure they get done. Or something to that effect. jmo

 

[ThinkTank]

JB? Who would that be?

think defense lawyer ...

 

[whiteangora]

think defense lawyer ...

I did, but I thought that was too obvious. Always thinking contrary.

 

[RR0004]

I do not know for certain that she did lie, so let me preface my remarks with that.
For the purpose of this discussion regarding if she lied will they charge her....I can give my opinion.

If, as and when it is determined that someone falsified a document in a death penalty murder trial and submitted it under oath as truthful, yes they will be charged and arrested for it. This is different than the misguided washing of the pants and spraying febreeze in a car. This would be knowing, purposeful lying, uner the penalty of perjury to prosecutors/federal officers and or police investigators.
I trust her lawyer has explained to her in great detail the consequences of doing so. Therefore, I do NOT expect her to sit in a deposition across the table from learned, seasoned Assistant District Attorneys and be in the same frame of mind as when she had Mort the interviewer in her living room. Much like I imagine what happened with Dominic Casey, faced with the me or them choice, I believe she will not dare perpetuate a lie when the depo continues.
When they presented Mr. Jordan with the various and sundry accounts of the folks that were ON HIS TEAM who detailed the exact area was under water, he came to a new understanding that he was "mistaken". You can imagine the same epiphany from her, and then some.
Just by her writings alone, it is clear she has followed the case with a deep interest and personal friendship with mom and pop. That tells me she is well aware of what happened publicly to Jill Kerley, how her entire past was published, nationally , including but not limited to her being a FELON, the drug charges, etc. To say it was humiliating would be a very understated guess.
The fact that Laura would contact Joe Jordan and tell him she is working with the defense, try to convince him he was with her at locations he knows he was not , when he has no idea what the hell she is talking about gives us clues into her level of ...... how shall I say this.....Ms. Wrayesque misguided thinking. Perhaps she heard of the thousands of dollars that Kio, Ricardo and others got for their short stories and photos and fancied her story as being worth life changing amounts to the tabloids. I have no idea.
The thing I do know is
she WILL have to complete her deposition
they WILL present her with ample evidence to contradict her claim and the document
she WILL have been advised with competent legal counsel at her side

and at the end of that deposition, in the words of Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. all minds will be clear.

Short answer to your question, if she lies to the prosecutors and if the document has been purposely falsified by her , will she be charged......YES. There is zero chance that could be tolerated, she would be held accountable to the strongest remedy the law allows, it would be swift and certain.

She will not do so, she will back off it it, like a scared kid, is my prediction. If she has lied have no doubt that she is ill over this. It is the kind of sick your grandmother warned you about if you tell a lie and then have to tell another to cover up for it. It is a guilt feeling in the pit of your stomach, that begins as emotional and can manifest itself to feel literally physical, it is also fear.
Nevertheless......if she has got a pulse, Judge Perry will order her propped up in bed on line with Skype and she WILL complete the depo. If Miss Kerley, dying of cancer is testifying, by God so is Ms. Buchanan.

Have faith in this Judge. He has dealt with people far more sophisticated than this crew and this is NOT above his or the prosecutors skill set to manage in VERY short order!


"Mea Culpa" is Latin for "I'm to blame." The literal translation from the Latin is 'through my own fault'.

Great post TWA! What if she's taken off the defense's witness list?

 

[Snaz]

Well...you'd think they would change their name...on Val's site it's the same....I will PM you the name they go by on JB'S website......if you want...yeah...I ran scans and got some alerts...shut me down for a while. I use CCleaner and also the reg edit feature, plus Norton and Malware Bytes...Paranoid much LOL ?

Is it allowed for you to post the link to the website?

TIA!

 

[ThinkTank]

Is it allowed for you to post the link to the website?

TIA!

It is a friend on JB's FB page. Not for certain the same person who was BANNED from here though.

 

[The World According]

I do not think the judge has jurisdiction over her in her home state; however, if the crime (falsification of documents in a murder case) occured in Florida, he can charge her in Florida and extradite her back to Florida to be tried. So there IS jurisdiction in Florida because the event happened there.

Thanks for helping us Gia.Good to see you on the board!

 

[The World According]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae5J_ObjkTw[/ame]
Check this out , in October 2009 is when the defense first was told by the judge put up your evidence you claim to have , and it was then that Jose admitted he had yet to look into the TES volunteers and verify their statements, bounce things off one another....
think Laura Buchanan and how a year , or two ago, if he had only took the time to look up her team members the way Kathi Belich did, he would have learned that they all say NO , Laura is not correct, they were not on Suburban with her that day, that they were as all of the documents with TES indicate, at Blanchard Park.

Can you imagine filing court motions without even verifying her statements with the others on her team? IMO, it is beyond lazy and complacent, I just cannot even imagine a first year law student not realizing homework and verification is required in order to produce a motion that is in good faith.

Setting aside him not doing it in a timely manner, apparently, by his reaction to Kathi's questions about haven't you talked to the other folks on her team , as we sit here today he STILL has not thought of that angle.
Well, perhaps this week he is deposing Joe Jordan. Finally.
I love Mrs. Drane Burdick at this six minute mark, I think she sums up the entire case...
"It is a farce!"
"The defense efforts do not even come close to the legal requirements necessary for the court to even entertain the motions,
their motions are replete with errors from top to bottom, it is insufficient as a matter of law,
there has not even been a good faith effort, clearly, according to case law,
and the court should not even entertain the motion."

Guess what? Judge Strickland concurred.

Sadly, in my humble opinion, the addition of the experienced Mr. Cheney does not seem to have improved their filings. Odd.

This is also the tape where Jose disparages his defense experts saying they are older and beyond the age of technology. I hope these aren't the folks he wants the JAC to pay thousands and thousands and thousands of the hard working Florida taxpayers money to. Kidding. I am kidding.

It was at this hearing, as in others that to his credit Brad spoke up and said NO there is no conflict of interest between TES and mom and pop Anthony.

 

[The World According]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Eqp8yGXPG0[/ame]

How is that working for you Jose and Cheney?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChiN7LbFC9o[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12JPRXi-RFM[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TAxZBpNigQ[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmBoNzsRp0s[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHdqgHvGxYM[/ame]

Richard Hornsby, "THE DEFENSE POINTING AT ROY KRONK, AND HIS ALLEGED PREVIOUS USE OF DUCT TAPE IS BASICALLY ADMITTING THAT CAYLEE ANTHONY DIED AS A RESULT OF DUCT TAPE BEING AFFIXED TO HER FACE AND HER SUFFOCATING".

 

[Sooner Fan#1]

Is it allowed for you to post the link to the website?

TIA!

I know we can link to Valhall's blog...she is a member here...

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/

 

[The World According]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThJGre6B__4[/ame]