Capri
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,776
- Reaction score
- 91
One more thought/question.
<<Conway admits the Anthonys have made conflicting statements in the past. They will be re-interviewed by investigators. He said, for the next interview they give to authorities, there will not be any conflicting statements. >>
So now that they "admit" they have made conflicting statements, and their lawyer has made it public knowledge, aren't they obligated to tell the truth anyway, if investigators did "re-interview" them. What are they going to say, no I'm not telling you the truth, b/c you aren't giving me immunity? It doesn't work that way with LE & the FBI.
<<Conway admits the Anthonys have made conflicting statements in the past. They will be re-interviewed by investigators. He said, for the next interview they give to authorities, there will not be any conflicting statements. >>
So now that they "admit" they have made conflicting statements, and their lawyer has made it public knowledge, aren't they obligated to tell the truth anyway, if investigators did "re-interview" them. What are they going to say, no I'm not telling you the truth, b/c you aren't giving me immunity? It doesn't work that way with LE & the FBI.