- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,240
- Reaction score
- 274,117
In Aruba, by Dutch law a suspect is being informed of his rights, such as his right to remain silent, his right to an attorney etc.
Giordano was interviewed as a witness and such will be indicated above his typed witness statements (today, August 5, we interviewed as a witness person such and such).
Someone who does not know what happened is not considered a witness.
Other then that, a witness has no right to remain silent, a suspect has and will be informed of that.
Initially the questions may have been of another nature. The car was not searched etc.
I do not think they asked him the same questions over and over again and Giordano still having the impression he was only considered a witness, I do not think he is that ignorant. IMO
Even if he came in for questioning a couple of times that does not mean they were grilling him, also in a missing persons case (or accidental drowning which Giordano reported) there are lots of questions and things that have to be arranged and carried out, there were just two days in between Robyn going missing and Giordano being arrested (morning of August 5). So there has not been an extensive period in which they could have analysed his statements, interviewed witnesses, and so on. IMO
BBM
Someone who walks into the ocean with their 'partner' , a partner they have taken a large life insurance policy on, and returns from the ocean ALONE, is not considered a witness anymore, they are often considered a suspect . And just saying they do not know what happened is not always enough.