I am not joking.
The whole beach location has been something that was unclear from the beginning.
The first reports claimed they went swimming behind the former Nanki Country Club.
Then it was mentioned Robyn allegedly drowned while snorkeling at Baby Beach.
Then it was mentioned they had went swimming at Rodgers beach.
Then it was mentioned they went swimming between Rogers Beach and Baby Beach.
Then two months later someone made a video of "rocky point" and since then it has been assumed that is where Giordano claims they went snorkeling.
You said the whole area is the same (as in rocks) but how then does that fit witnesses who have seen them walking the shoreline, if it is just jagged rocks how could Robyn walk the shoreline there on high heels or barefoot?
Then there are witnesses who claim the towels of Robyn and Giordano were on the beach and her dress aside from the towels on the beach, if it is all rocks how could anyone be lying there even when using a towel?
You keep referring to Babybeach while as far as I know they were at the southern part of Rodgers Beach, that is not just rocks, there are area's of rocks, but since there are area's of sand too, why does ABC show the rocks only, why would anyone assume they must have walked over these jagged rocks while they could have walked in the sand?
Then I see footage of the re enactment, and I see no rocks, it is green and sand in the re enactment.
Here is a picture of the area, you have been there, can you point out to me where in your opinion they went into the sea? TIA